Mikhail Gusarov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Thanks. Gnome-tracker? Did they copy-paste pyinotify? Sigh.
I suppose so.
debian-hppa guys are very quiet, so I've looked into kernel sources and patch
seems ok, so added it to the upcoming 0.0.8-2
Sweet. I'm glad it helped.
Cheers,
Jan
--
The
hi! I searched for pyinotify hppa and I found a patch for this bug in the
gnome-tracker list. Following is the URL:
http://mail.gnome.org/archives/tracker-list/2007-February/msg00104.html
It includes other architectures that's already been included in
inotify_syscalls.h so just grab the hppa
Twas brillig at 11:10:01 17.06.2007 UTC+10 when Jan Michael C. Alonzo did gyre
and gimble:
JMCA hi! I searched for pyinotify hppa and I found a patch for this bug in the
JMCA gnome-tracker list.
Thanks. Gnome-tracker? Did they copy-paste pyinotify? Sigh.
JMCA It includes other
tags 382647 help
thanks
I'm asking for help with pyinotify package on hppa: there are arch-dependent
pieces for each architecture in src/pyinotify/inotify_syscalls.h, and the
section for hppa is not yet done by the upstream.
--
JID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
Package: pyinotify
Version: 0.5.2-1.1
Severity: important
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
Automatic build of pyinotify_0.5.2-1.1 on bld-3 by sbuild/hppa 85
Build started at 20060803-2234
[...]
** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
Build-Depends:
5 matches
Mail list logo