Bug#382658: xaralx: Tested patch on powerpc, uncovers further problems.

2007-02-27 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 07:49:50PM +, Alex Bligh a écrit : > I /think/ that Charles' patch is just an application of the patch I've > already done Dear all, yes, the patch I sent is nothing else thant the debianization of the patch which was already proposed earlier in this bug. The reason I

Bug#382658: xaralx: Tested patch on powerpc, uncovers further problems.

2007-02-27 Thread Alex Bligh
Joachim, --On 24 February 2007 13:15 +0100 Joachim Breitner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: thanks for the info. I will fix the debian/rules when a working powerpc patch is available (or a new version is uploaded anyways). I think Alex Bligh, who wrote the patch, monitors xaralx pts mails, so mayb

Bug#382658: xaralx: Tested patch on powerpc, uncovers further problems.

2007-02-24 Thread Joachim Breitner
Hi, thanks for the info. I will fix the debian/rules when a working powerpc patch is available (or a new version is uploaded anyways). I think Alex Bligh, who wrote the patch, monitors xaralx pts mails, so maybe he can comment on the crash. Greetings, Joachims Am Samstag, den 24.02.2007, 19:31 +

Bug#382658: xaralx: Tested patch on powerpc, uncovers further problems.

2007-02-24 Thread Charles Plessy
Package: xaralx Version: 0.7r1692-2 Followup-For: Bug #382658 Hi, I have tested the patch provided in this bug. First of all, I had to modify debian/rules to build the package (see the attached debdiff). Basically, on Debian G5 machines running the powerpc port, uname -m report to be ppc64, which