Bug#383600: behaviour of update-initramfs -u has changed, only updates latest kernel initrd

2007-08-19 Thread Ross Boylan
maks suggests you may want to set all for update_initramfs in /etc/initramfs-tools/update-initramfs.conf I think this means update_initramfs=all . Is that correct? Neither the comments in that file nor the man page list all as a legal option. It would be good to update them if it is. I

Bug#383600: behaviour of update-initramfs -u has changed, only updates latest kernel initrd

2006-08-28 Thread Sven Luther
On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 12:59:53AM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: severity 383600 serious thanks Sven Luther wrote: On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 07:03:52PM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: Eduard Bloch wrote: #include hallo.h * Michael Biebl [Fri, Aug 18 2006, 01:07:34PM]: Eduard Bloch wrote:

Bug#383600: behaviour of update-initramfs -u has changed, only updates latest kernel initrd

2006-08-28 Thread maximilian attems
first of all this not serious, update-initramfs -u doesn't update _all_ initramfs and it never did. so this bug report is bogus. On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 10:07:42AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 12:59:53AM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: I'm raising the severity to serious,

Bug#383600: behaviour of update-initramfs -u has changed, only updates latest kernel initrd

2006-08-28 Thread Michael Biebl
maximilian attems wrote: first of all this not serious, update-initramfs -u doesn't update _all_ initramfs and it never did. so this bug report is bogus. Mea culpa! You are right, update-initramfs -u never updated all initramfs (only your last email made this clear to me). I'm not quite sure

Bug#383600: behaviour of update-initramfs -u has changed, only updates latest kernel initrd

2006-08-27 Thread Michael Biebl
severity 383600 serious thanks Sven Luther wrote: On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 07:03:52PM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: Eduard Bloch wrote: #include hallo.h * Michael Biebl [Fri, Aug 18 2006, 01:07:34PM]: Eduard Bloch wrote: #include hallo.h * Michael Biebl [Fri, Aug 18 2006, 10:26:53AM]: I

Bug#383600: behaviour of update-initramfs -u has changed, only updates latest kernel initrd

2006-08-21 Thread Eduard Bloch
#include hallo.h * Michael Biebl [Fri, Aug 18 2006, 07:03:52PM]: Eduard Bloch wrote: #include hallo.h * Michael Biebl [Fri, Aug 18 2006, 01:07:34PM]: Eduard Bloch wrote: #include hallo.h * Michael Biebl [Fri, Aug 18 2006, 10:26:53AM]: I suggest to revert to the old behaviour and make

Bug#383600: behaviour of update-initramfs -u has changed, only updates latest kernel initrd

2006-08-18 Thread Michael Biebl
Package: initramfs-tools Version: 0.74 Severity: important I can't pinpoint the exact release but the behaviour of update-initramfs -u has changed recently. update-initramsfs -u is used in several postinst scripts and formerly updated the initrd of all installed kernels. The new behaviour is, to

Bug#383600: behaviour of update-initramfs -u has changed, only updates latest kernel initrd

2006-08-18 Thread Eduard Bloch
#include hallo.h * Michael Biebl [Fri, Aug 18 2006, 10:26:53AM]: I suggest to revert to the old behaviour and make -u update all installed kernels. Atm I have to specify each kernel separately vi -k to update them all. Why should one update _all_ initramfs images when beeing interested in only

Bug#383600: behaviour of update-initramfs -u has changed, only updates latest kernel initrd

2006-08-18 Thread Michael Biebl
Eduard Bloch wrote: #include hallo.h * Michael Biebl [Fri, Aug 18 2006, 10:26:53AM]: I suggest to revert to the old behaviour and make -u update all installed kernels. Atm I have to specify each kernel separately vi -k to update them all. Why should one update _all_ initramfs images when

Bug#383600: behaviour of update-initramfs -u has changed, only updates latest kernel initrd

2006-08-18 Thread maximilian attems
hello michael, thanks your request made my day. indeed in ubuntu all initrd.img gets updated. On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 12:12:28PM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote: #include hallo.h * Michael Biebl [Fri, Aug 18 2006, 10:26:53AM]: I suggest to revert to the old behaviour and make -u update all

Bug#383600: behaviour of update-initramfs -u has changed, only updates latest kernel initrd

2006-08-18 Thread maximilian attems
On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 01:07:34PM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: snipp answered stuff In addition only the newest kernel installed is updated, which is very confusing imho. If it all, it should update the initrd of the currently running kernel. this for upgrade reasons. if you install from sarge

Bug#383600: behaviour of update-initramfs -u has changed, only updates latest kernel initrd

2006-08-18 Thread Eduard Bloch
#include hallo.h * Michael Biebl [Fri, Aug 18 2006, 01:07:34PM]: Eduard Bloch wrote: #include hallo.h * Michael Biebl [Fri, Aug 18 2006, 10:26:53AM]: I suggest to revert to the old behaviour and make -u update all installed kernels. Atm I have to specify each kernel separately vi -k to

Bug#383600: behaviour of update-initramfs -u has changed, only updates latest kernel initrd

2006-08-18 Thread Sven Luther
On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 12:12:28PM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote: #include hallo.h * Michael Biebl [Fri, Aug 18 2006, 10:26:53AM]: I suggest to revert to the old behaviour and make -u update all installed kernels. Atm I have to specify each kernel separately vi -k to update them all. Why

Bug#383600: behaviour of update-initramfs -u has changed, only updates latest kernel initrd

2006-08-18 Thread Michael Biebl
Eduard Bloch wrote: #include hallo.h * Michael Biebl [Fri, Aug 18 2006, 01:07:34PM]: Eduard Bloch wrote: #include hallo.h * Michael Biebl [Fri, Aug 18 2006, 10:26:53AM]: I suggest to revert to the old behaviour and make -u update all installed kernels. Atm I have to specify each kernel

Bug#383600: behaviour of update-initramfs -u has changed, only updates latest kernel initrd

2006-08-18 Thread Sven Luther
On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 07:03:52PM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: Eduard Bloch wrote: #include hallo.h * Michael Biebl [Fri, Aug 18 2006, 01:07:34PM]: Eduard Bloch wrote: #include hallo.h * Michael Biebl [Fri, Aug 18 2006, 10:26:53AM]: I suggest to revert to the old behaviour and make -u