Bug#385272: closed by Julien BLACHE [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Re: Bug#385272: mcelog: Please include timestamps in the logfile)

2006-09-18 Thread Michael Renner
Hi Julien, I discussed the timestamp idea with Andi Kleen, and, basically, it's of no use because the precision of the timestamp would suck. The kernel collects MCE data every 5 minutes by default, then mcelog runs every 5 minutes, collecting the data collected by the kernel. [..] Andi

Bug#385272: closed by Julien BLACHE [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Re: Bug#385272: mcelog: Please include timestamps in the logfile)

2006-09-18 Thread Julien BLACHE
Michael Renner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Uhm, if I've got a logfile full of MCE entries after (e.g.) returning from a weeks vacation a timestamp with a granularity of 5 minutes is That'd be 10 minutes, not 5, and it can be even more than that under some circumstances. better than none,

Bug#385272: closed by Julien BLACHE [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Re: Bug#385272: mcelog: Please include timestamps in the logfile)

2006-09-18 Thread Julien BLACHE
Michael Renner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, That'd be 10 minutes, not 5, and it can be even more than that under some circumstances. If I run the collector every 5 minutes fetching all messages that have been generated since the last invocation the granularity should be 5 minutes, or am I

Bug#385272: closed by Julien BLACHE [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Re: Bug#385272: mcelog: Please include timestamps in the logfile)

2006-09-18 Thread Michael Renner
Julien BLACHE wrote: Michael Renner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Uhm, if I've got a logfile full of MCE entries after (e.g.) returning from a weeks vacation a timestamp with a granularity of 5 minutes is That'd be 10 minutes, not 5, and it can be even more than that under some circumstances.