user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
usertags #387448 close-20070831
thanks
On Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 02:57:38PM +0200, Yuri D'Elia wrote:
I know this has been reported before to death [since gnutls is being used],
but I will just add another twist, since I'm tired of rebuilding exim with
OpenSSL manually.
On Mon, Sep 18, 2006 at 09:58:39PM +0200, Yuri D'Elia wrote:
On 18 Sep 2006, at 12:53, Marc Haber wrote:
I'm not native english speaker, so I did my best.
Thanks. I will commit some changes to the docs, but am not going to
make it sound like using the gnutls-bin/openssl based approach is
On Sun, Sep 17, 2006 at 05:26:04PM +0200, Yuri D'Elia wrote:
On 16 Sep 2006, at 23:48, Marc Haber wrote:
Upstream quickly tagged as this as can't be done: I'd say this
simply wrong. Everything can be done, provided enough time is given.
Do you really think that it should be exim's job to
On Sun, Sep 17, 2006 at 06:14:07PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
Thanks, I have commited the fallback-to-openssl stuff to SVN (I have
changed preferences to still prefer gnutls, though).
May I ask why you hae gnutls preferred? openssl is more economically
handling entropy, and if both are
On 2006-09-18 Marc Haber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
Thanks. I will commit some changes to the docs, but am not going to
make it sound like using the gnutls-bin/openssl based approach is
mandatory.
I think both of us agree that generating the parameters offline is
indeed superior and there
On 2006-09-18 Marc Haber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Sep 17, 2006 at 06:14:07PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
Thanks, I have commited the fallback-to-openssl stuff to SVN (I have
changed preferences to still prefer gnutls, though).
May I ask why you hae gnutls preferred?
Linking
On 18 Sep 2006, at 12:53, Marc Haber wrote:
I'm not native english speaker, so I did my best.
Thanks. I will commit some changes to the docs, but am not going to
make it sound like using the gnutls-bin/openssl based approach is
mandatory.
Of course, but please emphasize that it's
On 16 Sep 2006, at 23:48, Marc Haber wrote:
Upstream quickly tagged as this as can't be done: I'd say this
simply wrong. Everything can be done, provided enough time is given.
Do you really think that it should be exim's job to re-implement a
good part of a TLS library? Please take this up
On 2006-09-17 Yuri D'Elia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
Ok. If you plan to incorporate the use of openssl in cron.daily/exim4-
base, change this to a gnutls-bin | openssl then.
Patches attached.
Thanks, I have commited the fallback-to-openssl stuff to SVN (I have
changed preferences to
On 2006-09-14 Yuri D'Elia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: exim4
Version: 4.63-3
Severity: important
I know this has been reported before to death [since gnutls is being used],
but I will just add another twist, since I'm tired of rebuilding exim with
OpenSSL manually.
GnuTLS drains the
On 16 Sep 2006, at 15:39, Andreas Metzler wrote:
Hello,
Do you have gnutls-bin installed at all?
The only thing causing exim to block on STARTTLS is key and dh-param
generation. Both is done offline (/etc/cron.daily/exim4-base invoking
/usr/share/exim4/exim4_refresh_gnutls-params which uses
On Sat, Sep 16, 2006 at 06:09:35PM +0200, Yuri D'Elia wrote:
On 16 Sep 2006, at 15:39, Andreas Metzler wrote:
The only thing causing exim to block on STARTTLS is key and dh-param
generation. Both is done offline (/etc/cron.daily/exim4-base invoking
/usr/share/exim4/exim4_refresh_gnutls-params
Package: exim4
Version: 4.63-3
Severity: important
I know this has been reported before to death [since gnutls is being used],
but I will just add another twist, since I'm tired of rebuilding exim with
OpenSSL manually.
GnuTLS drains the entropy pool much more quickly than OpenSSL. On server
reassign #387448 exim4-daemon-light,exim4-daemon-heavy
tags #387448 confirmed upstream help
user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
usertags #387448 gnutls
forwarded #387448 http://www.exim.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=390
thanks
On Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 02:57:38PM +0200, Yuri D'Elia wrote:
I know this has been
tags #387448 wontfix
thanks
Upstream has indicated that this is impossible to fix in exim. Please
look in upstream's bugzilla, verify their arguments and take up the
argument with them.
Greetings
Marc
--
-
Marc Haber
15 matches
Mail list logo
