reassign 390190 texlive-fonts-extra
tags 390190 + pending
stop
On 17.07.19 04:22, Norbert Preining wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Jul 2019, Hilmar Preuße wrote:
>> - texlive-fonts-extra dep on texlive-fonts-recommended
>> - texlive-generic-extra dep on texlive-generic-recommended
>
> I can imagine people
On Mon, 15 Jul 2019, Hilmar Preuße wrote:
> - texlive-fonts-extra dep on texlive-fonts-recommended
> - texlive-generic-extra dep on texlive-generic-recommended
I can imagine people having only extra installed without recommended,
for very specific purposes. So leaving out, but also adding the
On 29.09.06 19:25, Frank Küster wrote:
Hi Frank, hi Norbert,
> I was just trying to suggest proper dependencies for debiandoc-sgml, as
> an alternative to teTeX, and wondered why texlive-latex-extra does not
> depend on texlive-latex-recommended. This means that a package that
> needs files
Norbert Preining [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all!
On Fre, 29 Sep 2006, Frank Küster wrote:
texlive-latex-base texlive-latex-recommended texlive-latex-extra,
and no one would only want -extra without recommended.
Obviously this was wrong - why?
Cross installation on with teTeX? If
Package: texlive-base
Version: 2005.dfsg.1-1
Severity: normal
I was just trying to suggest proper dependencies for debiandoc-sgml, as
an alternative to teTeX, and wondered why texlive-latex-extra does not
depend on texlive-latex-recommended. This means that a package that
needs files from both
Hi all!
On Fre, 29 Sep 2006, Frank Küster wrote:
texlive-latex-base texlive-latex-recommended texlive-latex-extra,
and no one would only want -extra without recommended.
Obviously this was wrong - why?
Cross installation on with teTeX? If you want to install tl-latex-extra
on tetex you
On Fre, 29 Sep 2006, Norbert Preining wrote:
Contra i fascisti Vincerà la destra!
I must be completely drunken ... Let's hope that this will not happen,
more the other way round. But then again, maybe the reality was speaking
from these words, Unfortunately.
Best wishes
Norbert
7 matches
Mail list logo
