Bug#391126:

2006-10-10 Thread Jason Spiro
Regarding the Tor option: Perhaps there could be a command-line switch added to the tightvnc server to cause it to run as a Tor hidden service ( a server ending in whose hostname ends in .onion: see http://tor.eff.org/docs/tor-hidden-service.html ). Then, users could run a command such as:

Bug#391126:

2006-10-10 Thread Ola Lundqvist
Hi Interesting. The previous mail did not mention tor at all. Why do you want to use vnc in combination with tor? I can see no use for that. A web server, yes, but vnc ... no. But as you say, you want a public free service and that is nothing that I can create as a Debian package maintainer.

Bug#391126:

2006-10-10 Thread Ola Lundqvist
Hi again I have thought some more and realize that you may be talking about the client only, or? As far as I know vnc have no problem at all to connect to public servers from inside a NAT:ed network. Regards, // Ola On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 01:24:16PM -0400, Jason Spiro wrote: Regarding the

Bug#391126: TightVNC should have firewall tunneling built in - either NAT-defeating technology or third-party gatewaying

2006-10-04 Thread Jason Spiro
Package: tightvnc Severity: wishlist Most computer geeks nowadays are stuck behind NAT. It would be great if TightVNC had some form of firewall tunneling built in, just like the www.logmein.com and GoToMyPC.com remote access services do. That means that even if both my PC and the target PC are

Bug#391126: TightVNC should have firewall tunneling built in - either NAT-defeating technology or third-party gatewaying

2006-10-04 Thread Ola Lundqvist
Hi On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 11:49:33PM -0400, Jason Spiro wrote: Package: tightvnc Severity: wishlist Most computer geeks nowadays are stuck behind NAT. It would be great if TightVNC had some form of firewall tunneling built in, just like the www.logmein.com and GoToMyPC.com remote access

Bug#391126: TightVNC should have firewall tunneling built in - either NAT-defeating technology or third-party gatewaying

2006-10-04 Thread Ola Lundqvist
Hi I can see that this feature is available if you use Citrix instead of VNC. But Citrix cost a bit more... :) Regards, // Ola On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 11:49:33PM -0400, Jason Spiro wrote: Package: tightvnc Severity: wishlist Most computer geeks nowadays are stuck behind NAT. It would