On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 06:48:09PM +0100, Bruno Kleinert wrote:
please have a look at chapter 6.2.1 General guidelines for package
descriptions of the debian developers reference.
it says Package descriptions are not the place for advocating your
package, no matter how much you love it. i
On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 06:48:09PM +0100, Bruno Kleinert wrote:
also the reference mentions Avoid referring to other
applications or frameworks that the user might not be
familiar with
I think this section (given the context) is intending to
avoid descriptions which _rely_ on the reader having
this isn't a good package discription, as it tells of other packages
(darkplaces) and a commercial game (quake 1), which has nothing to do
with the content of the nexuiz package!
Nexuiz contains/uses darkplaces. This is a significant part of
Nexuiz. Without darkplaces, it's just a collection
hi!
please have a look at chapter 6.2.1 General guidelines for package
descriptions of the debian developers reference.
it says Package descriptions are not the place for advocating your
package, no matter how much you love it. i like nexuiz, too, but
there's no reason to advocate it against
4 matches
Mail list logo
