Robert Millan writes (Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Bug#391935: Bug #391935: Re: The
answer from Citrix Xen.org):
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 07:45:07PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
The people responsible for these decisions in Ubuntu didn't worry
about the non-freeness of the logo. Ubuntu would have been
Robert Millan writes (Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Bug#391935: Bug #391935: Re: The
answer from Citrix Xen.org):
This leads me to believe that, if we had kept using the non-free logo, our
set of Debian-specific changes to the package would have been a non-issue,
or at least a minor one.
I disagree
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 07:45:07PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
Robert Millan writes (Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Bug#391935: Bug #391935: Re: The
answer from Citrix Xen.org):
This leads me to believe that, if we had kept using the non-free logo, our
set of Debian-specific changes to the package
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 08:24:54PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
Robert Millan writes ([Pkg-xen-devel] Bug#391935: Bug #391935: Re: The
answer from Citrix Xen.org):
On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 02:15:29PM +0100, Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
Actually, I think there were two problems with firefox
Robert Millan writes ([Pkg-xen-devel] Bug#391935: Bug #391935: Re: The answer
from Citrix Xen.org):
On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 02:15:29PM +0100, Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
Actually, I think there were two problems with firefox: the logo issue
(that was solved by changing the icon), and the use
On Thu, Oct 09, 2008 at 01:33:22PM +1100, Ben Finney wrote:
Any free/community use can do whatever it wants, quite literally.
Any commercial distribution that wishes to call itself Xen must be
compatible with other Xen branded commercial offerings, otherwise
the commercial
6 matches
Mail list logo
