Marco Amadori skrev:
But I think that it is not a clean way to proceed in a create live
environment sense of a package, /proc filesystem means the current hardware
and kernel system pack of informations and not a generic debian system
informations nor an hardwareless or kernelless pack of
Alle 17:41, sabato 14 ottobre 2006, Tollef Fog Heen ha scritto:
[.. ] asking to have
/proc installed have only meanings of current system installs, not a
generic one. So this bug is valid for all packages that requires /proc to
finish the installation.
Then you should build in a UML or
Marco Amadori skrev:
Alle 17:41, sabato 14 ottobre 2006, Tollef Fog Heen ha scritto:
If we can't determine whether port 80 is in use or not, we
assume it is.
So if /proc is not mounted you could just assume that port 80 is free and do
not fail the installation of package will be possible?
Package: apache2
Hello,
as subject says, in postinst the looking for presency of mounted /proc could
be a nice improvements for this package, otherwise could not be installed in
chroots without /proc mounted, and since debian-live should not mount /proc
because could leave with a chroot where
I can tell
you that it's not rocket science to get /proc mounted in your target
chroot while installing packages and then, y'know, unmount it when
you're done.
In fact we did an hack for having /proc mounted in debian-live, but the bug
regards also installing apache in chroots without /proc
Marco Amadori skrev:
I can tell
you that it's not rocket science to get /proc mounted in your target
chroot while installing packages and then, y'know, unmount it when
you're done.
In fact we did an hack for having /proc mounted in debian-live, but the bug
regards also installing apache in
6 matches
Mail list logo
