On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 02:39:13PM +0100, Peter Van Eynde wrote:
If you can recompile sbcl you could try to change the parms.lisp
file move the LT to some other place. Maybe #xa000 to
#xa080?
Disclosure: this is well into the realm of deep magic for me. =)
I'd love to recompile, but
Hello,
Your logs show that there is a memory layout conflict in sbcl:
On Saturday 04 November 2006 10:45, J.P. Larocque wrote:
cat /proc/self/maps
---8---8---
0001-00014000 r-xp 08:01 6201
/bin/cat
00022000-00024000 rwxp 2000 08:01 6201
On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 02:39:13PM +0100, Peter Van Eynde wrote:
Hello,
Your logs show that there is a memory layout conflict in sbcl:
On Saturday 04 November 2006 10:45, J.P. Larocque wrote:
cat /proc/self/maps
---8---8---
0001-00014000 r-xp 08:01 6201
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 08:37:11AM +0100, Peter Van Eynde wrote:
could you send me the output of
cat /proc/self/maps
---8---8---
0001-00014000 r-xp 08:01 6201
/bin/cat
00022000-00024000 rwxp 2000 08:01 6201
Hello,
Let me first thank you for the bugreport, it is pretty clean and complete.
On Monday 23 October 2006 01:51, J.P. Larocque wrote:
The stack trace produced below probably doesn't convey any meaningful
information.
gdb does not work well with lispy environments I fear.
Loaded symbols
Package: sbcl
Version: 1:0.8.16-1
Severity: important
I cannot install sbcl on a Sun Ultra 1. sbcl crashes during package
configuration. The package isn't even marked as broken.
---8---8---
Selecting previously deselected package common-lisp-controller.
(Reading database ... 43010 files and
6 matches
Mail list logo