tags 395271 + fixed-upstream pending
thanks
Lucas Nussbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Actually, the patch works very well. The following patches failed to
> build with the current sbuild in unstable, but build fine with the
> patch:
[...]
> Roger, could you apply it?
Done. Due to refactori
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 12:04:07PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> tags 395271 + patch
> thanks
>
> Roger, could you apply it?
I'll review and apply it tonight, time permitting.
By the way, since you are using sbuild on a buildd and are actively
using it, would you like to join the buildd-tools p
On 23/05/08 at 13:11 +0300, Niko Tyni wrote:
> On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 08:39:49AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.27
> > # removing patch tag since the proposed patch doesnt work
> > tags 395271 - patch
>
> Did you actually try the
tags 395271 + patch
thanks
Actually, the patch works very well. The following patches failed to
build with the current sbuild in unstable, but build fine with the
patch:
bioperl_1.5.2.102-3
libclass-trait-perl_0.22-2
libemail-send-perl_2.192-2
libmodule-packaged-perl_0.86-1
libnet-dns-resolver-pro
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 08:39:49AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.27
> # removing patch tag since the proposed patch doesnt work
> tags 395271 - patch
Did you actually try the patch? Roger never commented on my reply where
I think I
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.27
# removing patch tag since the proposed patch doesnt work
tags 395271 - patch
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
6 matches
Mail list logo
