On Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 10:50:12PM +0100, Nicolas Fran?ois wrote:
chpasswd is currently not compiled with PAM support on Debian.
As PAM is responsible for updating /etc/security/opasswd, I prefer to keep
this bug open, but tagging it wontfix, until we decide whether we can
compile this
On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 10:15:35AM -0500, Brian Ristuccia wrote:
On Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 10:50:12PM +0100, Nicolas Fran?ois wrote:
chpasswd is currently not compiled with PAM support on Debian.
As PAM is responsible for updating /etc/security/opasswd, I prefer to keep
this bug open, but
On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 05:07:31PM +0100, Nicolas Fran?ois wrote:
I recommend you to set users' password by root to a simple password that
can be communicated to the user, but also tag the password as expired, so
that the user have to choose a new password the next time he login (and
then
On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 12:09:59PM -0500, Brian Ristuccia wrote:
On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 05:07:31PM +0100, Nicolas François wrote:
I recommend you to set users' password by root to a simple password that
can be communicated to the user, but also tag the password as expired, so
that the
tags 396726 wontfix
thanks
Hello,
On Thu, Nov 02, 2006 at 09:38:22AM -0500, Brian Ristuccia wrote:
When changing a password with chpasswd, the previous password hash is not
stored in /etc/security/opasswd. As a result, nothing prevents the user from
changing their password back to a
Package: passwd
Version: 1:4.0.3-31sarge5
When changing a password with chpasswd, the previous password hash is not
stored in /etc/security/opasswd. As a result, nothing prevents the user from
changing their password back to a previous (potentially compromised) value.
--
Brian Ristuccia
[EMAIL
6 matches
Mail list logo
