hey guys,
just ftr,
On Tuesday 22 May 2007 10:41, Ondřej Surý wrote:
so I'm not that enthousiastic. But I'll do some more research and
experimenting with this patch and a set of PHP applications, and see
whether it's something to worry about or not.
I suggest you read the patch :-).
Jan Wagner píše v Po 21. 05. 2007 v 21:02 +0200:
On Monday 21 May 2007 19:17, Ondřej Surý wrote:
See my previous comment. When I read that patch a while ago, I didn't
encounter any different behaviour in PHP skripts. My only concern was
that it's binary incompatible with ZendOptimizer,
On Tuesday 22 May 2007 09:27, you wrote:
Jan Wagner píše v Po 21. 05. 2007 v 21:02 +0200:
On Monday 21 May 2007 19:17, Ondřej Surý wrote:
See my previous comment. When I read that patch a while ago, I didn't
encounter any different behaviour in PHP skripts. My only concern was
that
Jan Wagner píše v Út 22. 05. 2007 v 09:51 +0200:
I'm aware of the procedure, cause maintaining sarge-backport of php5. This
teached me also, that providing security support for php5 is a hard job and
in my case its only to remove LFS support, adjust dependencies, disable
mysqli
and
On Monday 21 May 2007 19:17, Ondřej Surý wrote:
See my previous comment. When I read that patch a while ago, I didn't
encounter any different behaviour in PHP skripts. My only concern was
that it's binary incompatible with ZendOptimizer, which we are
incompatible with anyway due LFS support.
5 matches
Mail list logo
