Bug#397478: sdd: FTBFS: /bin/sh: incs/x86_64-linux-cc/Inull: No such file or directory

2006-11-14 Thread Daniel Baumann
Joerg Schilling wrote: You (yourself) did take the project independend make code from a different project's tarball. Maybe, you should just educate those people inside Debian who did not understand DFSG § 9. for a patch, there is nothing problematic with it. but including it into another

Bug#397478: sdd: FTBFS: /bin/sh: incs/x86_64-linux-cc/Inull: No such file or directory

2006-11-14 Thread Daniel Baumann
Joerg Schilling wrote: Please read the DFSG, if you believe that you cannot do this, then the License that might prevent it is not a free license acording to DFSG. this is not the place to discuss this again. cdrtools are purged from Debian, you can't influence the decission anymore. please

Bug#397478: sdd: FTBFS: /bin/sh: incs/x86_64-linux-cc/Inull: No such file or directory

2006-11-14 Thread Joerg Schilling
Daniel Baumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Joerg Schilling wrote: Please read the DFSG, if you believe that you cannot do this, then the License that might prevent it is not a free license acording to DFSG. this is not the place to discuss this again. cdrtools are purged from Debian, you

Bug#397478: sdd: FTBFS: /bin/sh: incs/x86_64-linux-cc/Inull: No such file or directory

2006-11-14 Thread Joerg Schilling
Daniel Baumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Joerg Schilling wrote: The program 'sdd' and The Schily Makefile system are independent projects (GPL speech: works). As the GPL is an OSI aproved license, it must not contaminate other projects like The Schily Makefile system, so there is no

Bug#397478: sdd: FTBFS: /bin/sh: incs/x86_64-linux-cc/Inull: No such file or directory

2006-11-14 Thread Joerg Schilling
Daniel Baumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Joerg Schilling wrote: You (yourself) did take the project independend make code from a different project's tarball. Maybe, you should just educate those people inside Debian who did not understand DFSG § 9. for a patch, there is nothing

Bug#397478: sdd: FTBFS: /bin/sh: incs/x86_64-linux-cc/Inull: No such file or directory

2006-11-09 Thread Joerg Schilling
Daniel Baumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: the attached patch adds the needed rules to build succesfully on amd64. However, I took it from sfind which ships a more updated rules-set. Unfortunately, it is licensed under CDDL only, and sdd is GPL only, hence the patch is incompatible. Don't be

Bug#397478: sdd: FTBFS: /bin/sh: incs/x86_64-linux-cc/Inull: No such file or directory

2006-11-09 Thread Daniel Baumann
Joerg Schilling wrote: The program 'sdd' and The Schily Makefile system are independent projects (GPL speech: works). As the GPL is an OSI aproved license, it must not contaminate other projects like The Schily Makefile system, so there is no problem with taking a recent makefilesystem and

Bug#397478: sdd: FTBFS: /bin/sh: incs/x86_64-linux-cc/Inull: No such file or directory

2006-11-08 Thread Daniel Baumann
Hi, the attached patch adds the needed rules to build succesfully on amd64. However, I took it from sfind which ships a more updated rules-set. Unfortunately, it is licensed under CDDL only, and sdd is GPL only, hence the patch is incompatible. Joerg, could you please release an updated version