In 2006, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
during the last months i had to review several packages. Quite a number
of packages were not buildable two times (eg. unrepresentable changes
to source). Most of these packages used svn-buildpackage or
cvs-buildpackage. This bug is quite annoying as
* Jonathan Nieder jrnie...@gmail.com [120911 05:45]:
during the last months i had to review several packages. Quite a number
of packages were not buildable two times (eg. unrepresentable changes
to source). Most of these packages used svn-buildpackage or
cvs-buildpackage. This bug is quite
Bernhard R. Link wrote:
* Jonathan Nieder jrnie...@gmail.com [120911 05:45]:
The requirements in policy for
debian/rules clean are very stringent --- to avoid the
unrepresentable changes it would be enough to _remove_ the modified
(regenerated) files, but
On Tue, 11 Sep 2012, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Bernhard R. Link wrote:
* Jonathan Nieder jrnie...@gmail.com [120911 05:45]:
The requirements in policy for
debian/rules clean are very stringent --- to avoid the
unrepresentable changes it would be enough to
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
Still, if any of you would like to do it, please wait a bit. Let's release
Wheezy first.
I agree that we should not upload any change along these lines to
policy in the near future. I disagree that we should not find a
consensus about correct behavior and
On Tue, 11 Sep 2012, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
Still, if any of you would like to do it, please wait a bit. Let's release
Wheezy first.
I agree that we should not upload any change along these lines to
policy in the near future. I disagree that we should
Hi,
In 2006, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
during the last months i had to review several packages. Quite a number
of packages were not buildable two times (eg. unrepresentable changes
to source). Most of these packages used svn-buildpackage or
cvs-buildpackage. This bug is quite annoying as one
7 matches
Mail list logo
