Bug#400421: Is this really a bug?

2011-12-05 Thread Maximiliano Curia
Hola Arthur Marsh! El 05/12/2011 a las 12:48 escribiste: Is there a standard set of error values that mount.$fstype is supposed to return to mount? The original problem was the boot process failing if a vfat filesystem was listed in /etc/fstab but the device did not exist (e.g. a removable

Bug#400421: Is this really a bug?

2011-12-05 Thread Arthur Marsh
Maximiliano Curia wrote, on 05/12/11 21:57: Hola Arthur Marsh! El 05/12/2011 a las 12:48 escribiste: Is there a standard set of error values that mount.$fstype is supposed to return to mount? The original problem was the boot process failing if a vfat filesystem was listed in /etc/fstab but

Bug#400421: Is this really a bug?

2011-12-04 Thread Arthur Marsh
Maximiliano Curia wrote, on 04/12/11 06:45: Hi, The mount command is filesystems agnostic, it doesn't know nor care which filesystems are supported by external commands and which ones by the mount syscall. So if there exists a file called mount.$fstype mount will try to execute it, if it

Bug#400421: Is this really a bug?

2011-12-03 Thread Maximiliano Curia
Hi, The mount command is filesystems agnostic, it doesn't know nor care which filesystems are supported by external commands and which ones by the mount syscall. So if there exists a file called mount.$fstype mount will try to execute it, if it fails mount would call the mount syscall. If it