Bug#400657: texlive-metapost: Please integrate feynmf more in TeXLive packages

2006-11-28 Thread Frank Küster
Kevin B. McCarty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is the above OK, or would you rather have aptitude install feynmf result in installation of TeXLive packages by default on a system with no TeX yet? I think that could be accomplished just by swapping the order of the tetex-bin | texlive-base-bin

Bug#400657: texlive-metapost: Please integrate feynmf more in TeXLive packages

2006-11-28 Thread Norbert Preining
Hi all! . Original Message ... On Mon, 27 Nov 2006 22:47:14 +0100 Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Kevin B. McCarty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: b) Remove _all_ FeynMF stuff from the texlive-metapost package, and make texlive-metapost Depend on feynmf instead. If this would be

Bug#400657: texlive-metapost: Please integrate feynmf more in TeXLive packages

2006-11-27 Thread Kevin B. McCarty
Package: texlive-metapost Version: 2005.dfsg.2-3 Severity: wishlist Hi TeX maintainers! I am hoping that FeynMF could be integrated a little better in TeXLive. Specifically, the FeynMF shipped in texlive-metapost is missing two things: * It would be nice to have a symlink

Bug#400657: texlive-metapost: Please integrate feynmf more in TeXLive packages

2006-11-27 Thread Frank Küster
Kevin B. McCarty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: b) Remove _all_ FeynMF stuff from the texlive-metapost package, and make texlive-metapost Depend on feynmf instead. If this would be preferable, I can very quickly upload a version of feynmf, 1.08-3, that is installable in parallel with TeXLive. The

Bug#400657: texlive-metapost: Please integrate feynmf more in TeXLive packages

2006-11-27 Thread Kevin B. McCarty
Frank Küster wrote: Kevin B. McCarty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: b) Remove _all_ FeynMF stuff from the texlive-metapost package, and make texlive-metapost Depend on feynmf instead. If this would be preferable, I can very quickly upload a version of feynmf, 1.08-3, that is installable in