Kevin B. McCarty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is the above OK, or would you rather have aptitude install feynmf
result in installation of TeXLive packages by default on a system with
no TeX yet? I think that could be accomplished just by swapping the
order of the tetex-bin | texlive-base-bin
Hi all!
. Original Message ...
On Mon, 27 Nov 2006 22:47:14 +0100 Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kevin B. McCarty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
b) Remove _all_ FeynMF stuff from the texlive-metapost package, and make
texlive-metapost Depend on feynmf instead. If this would be
Package: texlive-metapost
Version: 2005.dfsg.2-3
Severity: wishlist
Hi TeX maintainers!
I am hoping that FeynMF could be integrated a little better in TeXLive.
Specifically, the FeynMF shipped in texlive-metapost is missing two things:
* It would be nice to have a symlink
Kevin B. McCarty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
b) Remove _all_ FeynMF stuff from the texlive-metapost package, and make
texlive-metapost Depend on feynmf instead. If this would be preferable,
I can very quickly upload a version of feynmf, 1.08-3, that is installable in
parallel with TeXLive. The
Frank Küster wrote:
Kevin B. McCarty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
b) Remove _all_ FeynMF stuff from the texlive-metapost package, and make
texlive-metapost Depend on feynmf instead. If this would be preferable,
I can very quickly upload a version of feynmf, 1.08-3, that is installable in
5 matches
Mail list logo