tags 400829 +pending
thanks
Hi,
first of all, as said in my last message in this report, I don't want to
poison the suggests/recommends with a list of all these caching daemons.
Unrelated to that, live-helper does cache deb packages by default now
and re-uses them in a very simple way,
On Tue, 28 Nov 2006 18:34:22 -0500
csights [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
Thanks for the nice iso auto build script! I stumbled across it while
looking for a way to customize liveCDs. Sweet!
Anyway, I think Suggesting apt-cacher along with some commented out
configuration in
Anyway, the point is, how do you decide which package to suggest if
several might provide the same functionality, each with its own distinct
advantages and disadvantages? Perhaps all of the alternatives should
provide a virtual package, e.g. Provides: apt-package-proxy?
A virtual
Ben Armstrong wrote:
I don't see any particular reason to suggest apt-cacher over, for example,
approx which appears to me to be in better health than apt-cacher, which was
recently removed from testing and re-added again a few days later, which has
34 outstanding bugs against it, 4 of
Package: live-package
Version: 0.99.14-1
Severity: wishlist
Hello,
Thanks for the nice iso auto build script! I stumbled across it while
looking for a way to customize liveCDs. Sweet!
Anyway, I think Suggesting apt-cacher along with some commented out
configuration in
5 matches
Mail list logo
