Bug#401111: libsdnfile build-depends is not enough restrictive and first alternative is virtual

2006-12-01 Thread Adam Cécile (Le_Vert)
Le vendredi 1 décembre 2006 12:35, CJ van den Berg a écrit : > On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 11:32:38PM +0100, Adam Cécile wrote: > > You're build-depending on libsndfile-dev which is a virtual package > > without depending on a real package. I guess this is a policy violation. > > AFAIK, unversioned dep

Bug#401111: libsdnfile build-depends is not enough restrictive and first alternative is virtual

2006-12-01 Thread CJ van den Berg
On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 11:32:38PM +0100, Adam Cécile wrote: > You're build-depending on libsndfile-dev which is a virtual package > without depending on a real package. I guess this is a policy violation. AFAIK, unversioned dependencies on virtual packages are allowed. Would you mind pointing me

Bug#401111: libsdnfile build-depends is not enough restrictive and first alternative is virtual

2006-11-30 Thread Matt Zimmerman
On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 11:32:38PM +0100, Adam Cécile wrote: > Package: pulseaudio > Severity: normal > > Hi, > > You're build-depending on libsndfile-dev which is a virtual package > without depending on a real package. I guess this is a policy violation. > > The proper way to do is to depend o

Bug#401111: libsdnfile build-depends is not enough restrictive and first alternative is virtual

2006-11-30 Thread Le_Vert
Package: pulseaudio Severity: normal Hi, You're build-depending on libsndfile-dev which is a virtual package without depending on a real package. I guess this is a policy violation. The proper way to do is to depend on libsndfile1-dev (>= 1.0.10) | libsndfile-dev (>= 1.0.10). This will ensure