* Julien Danjou ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061220 09:53]:
> Nevertheless, I'll fix it today.
Thanks.
Cheers,
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Julien Danjou ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061215 11:41]:
> At 1166184631 time_t, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > Would it be possible to use that as a workaround for etch?
>
> That sounds ugly.
> You'll have to force me to, even if I can't fix it without hw/access to
> hw.
Well, actually, we get nearer to re
At 1166604470 time_t, Andreas Barth wrote:
> Well, actually, we get nearer to release of Etch, and we need to get rid
> of the remaining RC bugs *now*. Also, there hasn't been progress on this
> bug during the recent days.
>
> I don't like that fix either - but hey, it fixes the problem (and of
>
At 1166184631 time_t, Andreas Barth wrote:
> Would it be possible to use that as a workaround for etch?
That sounds ugly.
You'll have to force me to, even if I can't fix it without hw/access to
hw.
Cheers,
--
Julien Danjou
.''`. Debian Developer
: :' : http://julien.danjou.info
`. `' http://pe
* Julien Danjou ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061215 20:06]:
> At 1166184631 time_t, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > Would it be possible to use that as a workaround for etch?
>
> That sounds ugly.
> You'll have to force me to, even if I can't fix it without hw/access to
> hw.
Well, I'm not saying it is an optim
* Dimitri Puzin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061205 10:05]:
> Strange enough, it runs like a charm when compiled with -O2 ?!?
Would it be possible to use that as a workaround for etch?
Cheersm
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject o
On Tue, Dec 05, 2006 at 07:12:51PM +0100, Julien Danjou wrote:
> At 1165341916 time_t, Dimitri Puzin wrote:
> > Strange enough, it runs like a charm when compiled with -O2 ?!?
> >
> > If you need more information, please let me know.
>
> Could you try to
(gdb) print index
$1 = 2108
(gdb) print i
Hi,
I've compiled varmon again with -ggdb from vanilla source. Here is the
progress:
hostname:~/varmon-1.2.0# make clean
rm -f *.o core varmon
hostname:~/varmon-1.2.0# make varmon
gcc -o varmon varmon.c -Wall -lncurses -ggdb
varmon.c: In function ‘get_backplane_info’:
varmon.c:166: warning: pointe
At 1165341916 time_t, Dimitri Puzin wrote:
> Strange enough, it runs like a charm when compiled with -O2 ?!?
>
> If you need more information, please let me know.
Could you try to
(gdb) print index
(gdb) print inq.ProductIdentification[index]
(gdb) print *tmp
Is there any chance I could get acc
9 matches
Mail list logo
