Bdale Garbee wrote:
I believe the change in lintian responding to bug #394720 is over-zealous,
because I believe it should be a warning and not an error for a single source
package to deliver binary packages into both main and contrib. We have a few
legitimate packages in the archive where
Package: lintian
I believe the change in lintian responding to bug #394720 is over-zealous,
because I believe it should be a warning and not an error for a single source
package to deliver binary packages into both main and contrib. We have a few
legitimate packages in the archive where the
Bdale Garbee [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Package: lintian
I believe the change in lintian responding to bug #394720 is
over-zealous, because I believe it should be a warning and not an error
for a single source package to deliver binary packages into both main
and contrib. We have a few
On Wed, 2006-12-06 at 11:12 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
Should it even be a warning? That just requires an override for
legitimate cases, and I hate to do that.
Ok. I'm easy.
My rationale for a warning is that I suspect the number of legitimate
cases of this will remain small, and I don't
4 matches
Mail list logo
