Steve Kemp wrote:
> OK .. I will add the option.
>
> And then we'll close this bug and the other almost-identical one!
Sorry, I really forgot this and didn't look at the database.
The /bin/ls check broke the /dev/null copying and made me search for a
nice solution.
>
> I'm glad the talk w
See-also:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=383057
Steve
--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Steve Kemp wrote:
> I'm not sure this patch makes sense. It seems to me that if you
> want to create the configuration file(s) only then you should instead
> invoke xt-create-xen-config directly - and not use xen-create-image
> at all.
Apart from the more important below, as I understand, xt
OK .. I will add the option.
And then we'll close this bug and the other almost-identical one!
I'm glad the talk went well too!
Steve
--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm not sure this patch makes sense. It seems to me that if you
want to create the configuration file(s) only then you should instead
invoke xt-create-xen-config directly - and not use xen-create-image
at all.
Unless you're suggesting that you want to use it in a situation where
you want
Package: xen-tools
Tags: Patch
I stumbled over the bin/ls check after install, which seems to be new.
As I use xen-tools in some situations only for creatinf my xen config
files, this is not helpful in some situations.
here's a patch to add a noinstall option (against cvs version of some hours
6 matches
Mail list logo
