Bug#402830: Patch for the 3.0.2-2 NMU of smstools

2007-02-04 Thread Patrick Schoenfeld
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Mark, there is no question anymore if to wait or not to wait. But I've prepared a new version of the package, cause we got a new translation. Please find updated package here: http://gnukanne.just-imho.net/debian-devel/smstools_3.0.2-3.dsc And

Bug#402830: Patch for the 3.0.2-2 NMU of smstools

2007-02-04 Thread Mark Purcell
On Sunday 04 February 2007 13:58, you wrote: And please upload them as soon as possible. Wanna have this release cleared to continue with newer version in experimental. Thanks Patrick, I have built and uploaded. Mark pgpk3811ueJC7.pgp Description: PGP signature

Bug#402830: Patch for the 3.0.2-2 NMU of smstools

2007-01-22 Thread schönfeld / in-medias-res.com
Hi Mark, so how do we proceed with our upload? Is there any process in this case that happened here? Greets Patrick Mark Purcell wrote: Christian, Thanks for the NMU for smstools. However, please read the developers reference section on NMUs:

Bug#402830: Patch for the 3.0.2-2 NMU of smstools

2007-01-22 Thread Mark Purcell
so how do we proceed with our upload? Is there any process in this case that happened here? Patrick, No problems. We just need to configure a -3 build which encorporates what has been delivered by the -2 upload. Which I think it does already. The question is of timing. Do we wait until -2

Bug#402830: Patch for the 3.0.2-2 NMU of smstools

2007-01-22 Thread Christian Perrier
Quoting =?UTF-8?Q? sch=C3=B6nfeld?= / in-medias-res.com ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): Hi Mark, so how do we proceed with our upload? Is there any process in this case that happened here? In that specific case, I recommend you do the following on the tree of your planned upload: 1) apply the

Bug#402830: Patch for the 3.0.2-2 NMU of smstools

2007-01-20 Thread Christian Perrier
Dear maintainer of smstools, Four days ago, I sent you a notice announcing my intent to upload a NMU of your package to fix longstanding issues. You mentioned me that without new from you in a few days, I could upload a l10n-fixed version. I just uploaded this NMU to DELAYED/0-DAY (which means

Bug#402830: Patch for the 3.0.2-2 NMU of smstools

2007-01-20 Thread Mark Purcell
Christian, Thanks for the NMU for smstools. However, please read the developers reference section on NMUs: http://www.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/ch-pkgs.en.html#s-nmu NMU's are supposed to have a new minor version number. You should of numbered your package: 3.0.2-1.1 Patrick and I

Bug#402830: Patch for the 3.0.2-2 NMU of smstools

2007-01-20 Thread Christian Perrier
NMU's are supposed to have a new minor version number. You should of numbered your package: 3.0.2-1.1 Oh, bleh, my mistake. Deep apologies. This is about my 10th NMU of the day and this had to happen once. Sorry that it felt on your package. (looks like dch has an option for this, which I

Bug#402830: Patch for the 3.0.2-2 NMU of smstools

2007-01-20 Thread Mark Purcell
On Saturday 20 January 2007 13:22, you wrote: May I help in recovering the damage in some manner? If you did want to assist, there are Patricks package at: http://gnukanne.just-imho.net/debian-devel/smstools_3.0.2-2.dsc Also I am keen for co-maintainers, so if you use smstools, you

Bug#402830: Patch for the 3.0.2-2 NMU of smstools

2007-01-20 Thread Christian Perrier
Quoting Mark Purcell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): On Saturday 20 January 2007 13:22, you wrote: May I help in recovering the damage in some manner? If you did want to assist, there are Patricks package at: http://gnukanne.just-imho.net/debian-devel/smstools_3.0.2-2.dsc Also I am keen