Hello,
Just a quick update to confirm that this bug still exists. See: #525935
Sylvestre
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 02:03:10PM +0200, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
Just a quick update to confirm that this bug still exists. See: #525935
Thanks. We still haven't yet had any proposed patches to the
dependency resolver to correctly support alternative build dependencies.
Currently support is
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 01:24:26PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 02:03:10PM +0200, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
Just a quick update to confirm that this bug still exists. See: #525935
Thanks. We still haven't yet had any proposed patches to the
dependency resolver to
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 04:05:09PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 01:24:26PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 02:03:10PM +0200, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
Just a quick update to confirm that this bug still exists. See: #525935
Thanks. We still
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 03:38:42PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
I'm not sure that a separate type of Build-Depends field in the control
file is necessary. Surely a build dependency is required or not required;
there isn't really a case in between where it /might/ be required, is
there?
5 matches
Mail list logo
