Bug#403639: Fix committed in svn repo

2007-01-12 Thread Attilio Fiandrotti
Frans Pop wrote: On Thursday 11 January 2007 18:21, Loïc Minier wrote: I've uploaded these debs to unstable. OK, thanks. That means that we can get some more testing in before requesting migration. Let's hope that with Lenny we can switch to a truly integrated 2.10 soon. I strongly

Bug#403639: Fix committed in svn repo

2007-01-11 Thread Frans Pop
Hi Loïc, Again our thanks for your quick and excellent response. On Tuesday 09 January 2007 20:12, Loïc Minier wrote: It's not trivial to backport, the upstream 2.10 code doesn't map so well with our 2.8.20 with backported directfb and I think it wouldn't be possible to pull the 2.10

Bug#403639: Fix committed in svn repo

2007-01-11 Thread Loïc Minier
On Thu, Jan 11, 2007, Frans Pop wrote: I have tested the udeb from that location by rebuilding the installer with as only change that udeb, and I can confirm that the memory leaks are (almost?) completely gone. I have done a full installation and not noticed any regressions or problems.

Bug#403639: Fix committed in svn repo

2007-01-11 Thread Frans Pop
On Thursday 11 January 2007 18:21, Loïc Minier wrote: I've uploaded these debs to unstable. OK, thanks. That means that we can get some more testing in before requesting migration. Let's hope that with Lenny we can switch to a truly integrated 2.10 soon. Cheers, FJP pgpEPHH5c3ZSd.pgp

Bug#403639: Fix committed in svn repo

2007-01-11 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le jeudi 11 janvier 2007 à 18:30 +0100, Frans Pop a écrit : On Thursday 11 January 2007 18:21, Loïc Minier wrote: I've uploaded these debs to unstable. OK, thanks. That means that we can get some more testing in before requesting migration. Let's hope that with Lenny we can switch to a

Bug#403639: Fix committed in svn repo

2007-01-09 Thread Loïc Minier
On Mon, Jan 08, 2007, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote: Just wanted to say the patch was eventually committed to gnome svn [1]: i tried a backport to our 2.8.20 but was unable to due to that complex set of patches already present :( Would be possible building an experimental 2-8-20 udeb with this

Bug#403639: Fix committed in svn repo

2007-01-09 Thread Attilio Fiandrotti
Loïc Minier wrote: On Mon, Jan 08, 2007, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote: Just wanted to say the patch was eventually committed to gnome svn [1]: i tried a backport to our 2.8.20 but was unable to due to that complex set of patches already present :( Would be possible building an experimental 2-8-20

Bug#403639: Fix committed in svn repo

2007-01-08 Thread Attilio Fiandrotti
Hi Just wanted to say the patch was eventually committed to gnome svn [1]: i tried a backport to our 2.8.20 but was unable to due to that complex set of patches already present :( Would be possible building an experimental 2-8-20 udeb with this patch to see what its effects are? thanks