* Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-12-24 14:30]:
For my part, I've never heard of slang-slirp before, and it seems obvious to
me from the naming prefix that the slirp package does have prior claim to
the name. I think this just needs to be resolved by slang-slirp changing
its binary
Kapil Hari Paranjape wrote:
Regarding conflicts like that between slang-slirp and slirp.
(see recent bugs filed by Michael Ablassmeier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
).
I feel that this a currently an area not addressed by policy
sufficiently well.
On Fri, Dec 22, 2006 at 02:31:37PM +0530, Kapil Hari Paranjape wrote:
Regarding conflicts like that between slang-slirp and slirp.
(see recent bugs filed by Michael Ablassmeier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
).
I feel that this a currently an area not
Hello,
Regarding conflicts like that between slang-slirp and slirp.
(see recent bugs filed by Michael Ablassmeier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
).
I feel that this a currently an area not addressed by policy
sufficiently well.
Assume that:
1. There are
Kapil Hari Paranjape wrote:
Hello,
Regarding conflicts like that between slang-slirp and slirp.
(see recent bugs filed by Michael Ablassmeier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
).
I feel that this a currently an area not addressed by policy
sufficiently well.
Hello,
On Fri, 22 Dec 2006, Luk Claes wrote:
Kapil Hari Paranjape wrote:
In such a situation it would be incorrect to insist that one of the
packages use a binary with a different name---because of (1).
So what's wrong with insisting both of them changing the name?
That we would have two
Small correction.
On Fri, 22 Dec 2006, Kapil Hari Paranjape wrote:
Now suppose we get two programs that give us /usr/bin/slirp.comm.
Then we have:
/usr/bin/slirp.comm - /etc/alternatives/slirp - /usr/bin/slirp.comma
That should be:
/usr/bin/slirp.comm -
7 matches
Mail list logo
