On Fri, Dec 29, 2006 at 06:33:32PM -0500, Eric Dorland wrote:
tags 404553 unreproducible
thanks
Uh, please excuse my prior mail where I accused you of not reacting properly
to my bug report. It was my fault that I didn't read your entire response
but just the first lines. Let's hope that the
On Mon, Jan 01, 2007 at 10:24:46PM +0100, Julien BLACHE wrote:
Did you tried it to reproduce it or did you just closed it stating it's
unreproducible because you don't have access to a PPC box?
If you had read the Eric's mail, and not only the first line, you'd
Unfortunately that's what I
On Tue, Jan 02, 2007 at 09:27:19AM +0100, Ingo Juergensmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Fri, Dec 29, 2006 at 06:33:32PM -0500, Eric Dorland wrote:
tags 404553 unreproducible
thanks
Uh, please excuse my prior mail where I accused you of not reacting properly
to my bug report. It was my
Ingo Juergensmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
If you had read the Eric's mail, and not only the first line, you'd
Unfortunately that's what I did, because the rest of the mail looked as a
large quote of my mail to me, because Eric quoted quite a lot of it in his
answer... :-/
Don't reply
On Tue, Jan 02, 2007 at 11:16:51AM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
Unfortunately I can't reproduce this at all on my PowerBook G4, and it
doesn't look like anyone has stepped up to offer a me too. Have you
tried moving your .mozilla directory out of the way?
No, not my .mozilla directory.
On Tue, Jan 02, 2007 at 08:23:08PM +0100, Ingo Juergensmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Tue, Jan 02, 2007 at 11:16:51AM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
Unfortunately I can't reproduce this at all on my PowerBook G4, and it
doesn't look like anyone has stepped up to offer a me too. Have you
On Tue, Jan 02, 2007 at 08:52:34PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
So, it seems to me that something has changed in the code between 2.0 and
2.0.0.1 that messes something up with the paths.
In my ~/.mozilla/firefox/profiles.ini the Path is pointing to ~/.firefox
instead of ~/.mozilla/firefox/.
On Tue, Jan 02, 2007 at 08:52:34PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
That also means it won't be reproducible until we know what in your
ancient profile is causing the problem.
Ok, just for a quick test, I renamed ~/.firefox/$profile/prefs.js and
iceweasel startet fine,,,
The diff between old
On Tue, Jan 02, 2007 at 09:51:23PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
The diff between old prefs.js and newly generated prefs.js is attached. I
hope it helps, although I don't find something obvious...
One of the following might be a good start...
+user_pref(browser.display.screen_resolution, 72);
On Tue, Jan 02, 2007 at 09:17:49PM +0100, Ingo Juergensmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Tue, Jan 02, 2007 at 08:52:34PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
So, it seems to me that something has changed in the code between 2.0 and
2.0.0.1 that messes something up with the paths.
In my
On Tue, Jan 02, 2007 at 10:01:47PM +0100, Ingo Juergensmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Tue, Jan 02, 2007 at 09:51:23PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
The diff between old prefs.js and newly generated prefs.js is attached. I
hope it helps, although I don't find something obvious...
One of
On Tue, Jan 02, 2007 at 09:32:31PM +0100, Ingo Juergensmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Tue, Jan 02, 2007 at 08:52:34PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
That also means it won't be reproducible until we know what in your
ancient profile is causing the problem.
Ok, just for a quick test, I
Eric Dorland wrote:
tags 404553 unreproducible
Did you tried it to reproduce it or did you just closed it stating it's
unreproducible because you don't have access to a PPC box?
Why didn't you comment *anything* about the gdb output or anything else?
I got the impression that you're just
Ingo Juergensmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Eric Dorland wrote:
tags 404553 unreproducible
Did you tried it to reproduce it or did you just closed it stating it's
unreproducible because you don't have access to a PPC box?
If you had read the Eric's mail, and not only the first line,
On Mon, Jan 01, 2007 at 08:37:21PM +0100, Ingo Juergensmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Eric Dorland wrote:
tags 404553 unreproducible
Did you tried it to reproduce it or did you just closed it stating it's
unreproducible because you don't have access to a PPC box?
What part of Unfortunately
tags 404553 unreproducible
thanks
Ingo Juergensmann wrote:
Package: iceweasel
Version: 2.0+dfsg-1
Severity: important
Hi!
Short description:
Firefox/Iceweasel is crashing on my PPC box with this error:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:]~$ firefox
The application 'Gecko' lost its connection to the
Package: iceweasel
Version: 2.0+dfsg-1
Severity: important
Hi!
Short description:
Firefox/Iceweasel is crashing on my PPC box with this error:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:]~$ firefox
The application 'Gecko' lost its connection to the display :0.0;
most likely the X server was shut down or you
17 matches
Mail list logo
