On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 01:17:32PM +0100, Frederic Peters wrote:
Now, the package you've uploaded to unstable seems to offer an alternative
fix, but I have some trouble understanding it so I'm still hesitant to
accept it into etch. How does print-camera-list.c interface with udev to
On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 01:00:42PM +0100, Nicolas George wrote:
L'octidi 28 nivôse, an CCXV, Steve Langasek a écrit :
I'm actually fairly disinclined to accept this change for etch since as you
mention it is a regression, and moreover I haven't heard anything back from
the bug submitter
L'octidi 28 nivôse, an CCXV, Steve Langasek a écrit :
I'm actually fairly disinclined to accept this change for etch since as you
mention it is a regression, and moreover I haven't heard anything back from
the bug submitter about what actually gets broken on his system with this
bug since it
Hi Frederic,
On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 04:30:21PM +0100, Frederic Peters wrote:
Package: libgphoto2-2
Version: 2.2.1-12
Severity: grave
Tags: security
In /etc/udev/libgphoto2_generic_ptp_support.rules, there is the following
rule:
ACTION==add, SUBSYSTEM==usb_device,
Nicolas George wrote:
L'octidi 28 nivôse, an CCXV, Steve Langasek a écrit :
I'm actually fairly disinclined to accept this change for etch since as you
mention it is a regression, and moreover I haven't heard anything back from
the bug submitter about what actually gets broken on his
Steve Langasek wrote:
Now, the package you've uploaded to unstable seems to offer an alternative
fix, but I have some trouble understanding it so I'm still hesitant to
accept it into etch. How does print-camera-list.c interface with udev to
trigger calling check_ptp_camera?
L'octidi 28 nivôse, an CCXV, Frederic Peters a écrit :
I believe things such as crypto USB devices would be affected by the
bug.
I do not understand what you call a crypto USB device. On the computer I
discovered the bug, I had write access to the raw devices corresponding to
the printer and
L'octidi 28 nivôse, an CCXV, Frederic Peters a écrit :
It doesn't set appropriate group for devices which are PTP cameras but
not explicitely known by libgphoto2.
That would be a problem, indeed. I do not have any of those myself, so I can
not test. But I use the following rule for udev:
$ cat
Nicolas George wrote:
L'octidi 28 nivôse, an CCXV, Frederic Peters a écrit :
I believe things such as crypto USB devices would be affected by the
bug.
I do not understand what you call a crypto USB device. On the computer I
discovered the bug, I had write access to the raw devices
Nicolas George wrote:
Package: libgphoto2-2
Version: 2.2.1-12
Severity: grave
Tags: security
In /etc/udev/libgphoto2_generic_ptp_support.rules, there is the following
rule:
ACTION==add, SUBSYSTEM==usb_device, ENV{INTERFACE}=6/1/1, \
PROGRAM=/bin/sh -c 'K=%k; K=$${K#usbdev}; printf
Package: libgphoto2-2
Version: 2.2.1-12
Severity: grave
Tags: security
In /etc/udev/libgphoto2_generic_ptp_support.rules, there is the following
rule:
ACTION==add, SUBSYSTEM==usb_device, ENV{INTERFACE}=6/1/1, \
PROGRAM=/bin/sh -c 'K=%k; K=$${K#usbdev}; printf bus/usb/%%03i/%%03i
$${K.*}
On Sat, Dec 30, 2006 at 10:49:26AM +0100, Nicolas George wrote:
Package: libgphoto2-2
Version: 2.2.1-12
Severity: grave
Tags: security
In /etc/udev/libgphoto2_generic_ptp_support.rules, there is the following
rule:
ACTION==add, SUBSYSTEM==usb_device, ENV{INTERFACE}=6/1/1, \
Le decadi 10 nivôse, an CCXV, Steve Langasek a écrit :
Isn't the plugdev group empty by default? This is obviously a bug, but I'm
not sure it qualifies as a grave security bug.
The administrator is encouraged to add to this group users that need to
access cameras and similar devices. I believe
13 matches
Mail list logo
