[sorry for late reply]
On Mon, Jan 15, 2007 at 12:41:51AM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
problem is, that fixes need to survive upgrades.
It survives upgrades just fine, or at least it is supposed to by design.
hope so - we'll see on next round.
Now, how the heck you had a
[Paolo]
no, this was a freshly netinstall'd notebook, kept in sync with Etch
once a week at min. While I can't recall all opts taken in all
steps, I'm sure I didn't go too fancy - I'm not used to mount even
/tmp as tmpfs - but the result currently I have is:
Very strange. What is the content
On Sat, 13 Jan 2007, Paolo wrote:
config, is a secondary point, main one is that RAMRUN - ie /var/run on
tmpfs - and perhaps others, doesn't look like an acceptable option in Etch
current, as too many pkgs don't expect volatile dirs under /var/run hence
fail on (re)boot.
Respective
On Sun, Jan 14, 2007 at 11:33:24AM +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
Very strange. What is the content of your /etc/default/rcS and
/usr/share/initscripts/default.rcS ? All should list 'no' as the
setting for these options.
/etc/default/rcS
TMPTIME=0
SULOGIN=no
DELAYLOGIN=no
UTC=no
On Sun, Jan 14, 2007 at 12:13:34PM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
their init.d/ scripts. Case in point was clamav-daemon, which didn't start
on boot, expecting /var/run/clamav/ to be already there. Same for virus-DB
updater freshclam.
They are buggy. They need to be fixed. I
On Sun, 14 Jan 2007, Paolo wrote:
On Sun, Jan 14, 2007 at 12:13:34PM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
their init.d/ scripts. Case in point was clamav-daemon, which didn't start
on boot, expecting /var/run/clamav/ to be already there. Same for virus-DB
updater freshclam.
[Paolo]
while looking at an issue with tmpfs, to have /var/run *not* tmpfs,
I was suggested to check vars in subj but could not find any info on
that ( expect inspecting the code itself, of course).
'man 5 rcS' should give you some documentation. Where did you look?
Also - not sure whether
On Sat, Jan 13, 2007 at 08:01:52PM +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
[Paolo]
while looking at an issue with tmpfs, to have /var/run *not* tmpfs,
I was suggested to check vars in subj but could not find any info on
that ( expect inspecting the code itself, of course).
'man 5 rcS' should
Package: initscripts
Version: 2.86.ds1-36
Severity: normal
hi,
while looking at an issue with tmpfs, to have /var/run *not* tmpfs, I was
suggested to check vars in subj but could not find any info on that (
expect inspecting the code itself, of course).
Also - not sure whether the culprit is
9 matches
Mail list logo
