also sprach Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.02.02.1246 +0100]:
> I don't think it is ok to submit a "severity: important" bug and
> then not provide enough information to reproduce it.
I just cannot reproduce it, and at the time I wrote the bug, my
primary concern was getting my mail worki
severity 408531 normal
tags 408531 + unreproducible
thanks
I don't think it is ok to submit a "severity: important" bug and then
not provide enough information to reproduce it.
At the very minimum, you should have done something like this:
adduser somebody
cp /home/madduck/.procmailrc /home/some
> > By "more specific" I mean a *complete* .procmailrc file and
> > a *complete* message with which you can reproduce the error in
> > this way:
> >
> > cat message | procmail
> >
> > Try to make both .procmailrc and the message the minimal ones with
> > which you can reproduce it.
>
> I have no
also sprach Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.01.26.1522 +]:
> May I ask you to be more specific?
Of course, sorry.
> By "more specific" I mean a *complete* .procmailrc file and
> a *complete* message with which you can reproduce the error in
> this way:
>
> cat message | procmail
>
>
On Fri, 26 Jan 2007, martin f krafft wrote:
> Package: procmail
> Version: 3.22-16
> Severity: important
>
> Accidentally, I put the following rule in place:
>
> :0
> : ^Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> (note the colon).
>
> This resulted in thousands of entries of
>
> procmail: Skipped
Package: procmail
Version: 3.22-16
Severity: important
Accidentally, I put the following rule in place:
:0
: ^Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(note the colon).
This resulted in thousands of entries of
procmail: Skipped "^Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]"
*** glibc detected *** free(): invalid
6 matches
Mail list logo
