Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 09:25:42AM +0100, Frank Küster wrote: >> > You say that while later on you claimed not to understand everything about >> > the >> > package (update script). Don't you have the impression that this judgement >> > is >> > also based on incomplete information on the package ? > >> Of course, but how does that matter? The point is simply, if the >> release managers intend to keep the etch-ignore pattern, > > What "pattern" are you talking about?
Sorry, s/pattern/tag/. >> Therefore I'm asking the release team whether they still think that the >> etch-ignore tag should stay. > > Yes, it should. Okay, then I don't think it makes sense to discuss any new patches, since Romain seems to believe it's best fixed with a new upstream version. Regards, Frank -- Dr. Frank Küster Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)