Bug#410298: libconfig-general-perl: A block that contain something 0 is discarded

2007-02-09 Thread Sylvain Rochet
Package: libconfig-general-perl Version: 2.31-3 Severity: normal Hi, Here is my source config file, the source code used, and the Data::Dumper output. - config file - plop world plip 0 plup tag hophop contenthophop /plup

Bug#410298: libconfig-general-perl: A block that contain something 0 is discarded

2007-02-09 Thread Francesco Cecconi
Hello Sylvain, On Friday 09 February 2007 14:29, Sylvain Rochet wrote: Package: libconfig-general-perl Version: 2.31-3 Severity: normal Hi, Here is my source config file, the source code used, and the Data::Dumper output. - config file - plop world plip 0

Bug#410298: libconfig-general-perl: A block that contain something 0 is discarded

2007-02-09 Thread Sylvain Rochet
Hi, On Fri, Feb 09, 2007 at 04:23:11PM +0100, Francesco Cecconi wrote: test one test 1 -- problem You are completely wrong, it works with 1, there is somewhere a problem between a if ( block ) vs if ( defined $block ) Sylvain signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#410298: libconfig-general-perl: A block that contain something 0 is discarded

2007-02-09 Thread Francesco Cecconi
Hi, On Friday 09 February 2007 20:00, you wrote: Hi, On Fri, Feb 09, 2007 at 04:23:11PM +0100, Francesco Cecconi wrote: test one test 1 -- problem You are completely wrong, it works with 1, there is somewhere a problem between a if ( block ) vs if ( defined $block ) yes, OK, but if

Bug#410298: libconfig-general-perl: A block that contain something 0 is discarded

2007-02-09 Thread Sylvain Rochet
Hi, On Fri, Feb 09, 2007 at 08:50:08PM +0100, Francesco Cecconi wrote: yes, OK, but if your insert a 0 on label value not work because [if ( 0 )]. Is not a package bug, but a Config::General cod implementation. Wrong again, cf

Bug#410298: libconfig-general-perl: A block that contain something 0 is discarded

2007-02-09 Thread Sylvain Rochet
Hi, On Fri, Feb 09, 2007 at 08:50:08PM +0100, Francesco Cecconi wrote: Is not a package bug, but a Config::General cod implementation. Sorry I misread, in fact I thought you will send that to the upstream as DD does it often, I emailed the author of the module directly. Kind regards,