On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 07:32:45AM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
> > > Interesting spot. FWIW, we do provide a fedault [homes] share so that
> > > will probably happen with the defautl setup of the package.
> >
> > What about adding "backup" to "invalid users" in smb.conf fix this
> > problem?
>
> > Interesting spot. FWIW, we do provide a fedault [homes] share so that
> > will probably happen with the defautl setup of the package.
>
> What about adding "backup" to "invalid users" in smb.conf fix this
> problem?
For "backup", yes, but I think this doesn't scale well. The problem
could ha
On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 10:30:16AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 10, 2007 at 04:47:46PM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
> > Quoting Daniel Fernández ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > > Package: samba
> > > Version: 3.0.23d-4
> > > Severity: normal
> > > Samba server list system files under
> What about adding "backup" to "invalid users" in smb.conf fix this
> problem?
It will require to add all system users (I mean all the ones that are
in /etc/passwd and are not "real" users). The valid users = %S option
works well for me.
Daniel.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, Feb 10, 2007 at 04:47:46PM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Quoting Daniel Fernández ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > Package: samba
> > Version: 3.0.23d-4
> > Severity: normal
> >
> > Samba server list system files under backup share even whent backup
> > share does not exist. However, the conte
> > > + valid users = %S
> >
> > > With this, at least the default setup will not expose such valid
> > > system users home directories to others.
> > >
> > But . . . I can't access my non-home shares now, like
>
>
> Sounds like you added "valid users = %S" to the global section while
> you
Quoting Daniel Fernández ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > + valid users = %S
>
> > With this, at least the default setup will not expose such valid
> > system users home directories to others.
> >
> But . . . I can't access my non-home shares now, like
Sounds like you added "valid users = %S" to the
> + valid users = %S
> With this, at least the default setup will not expose such valid
> system users home directories to others.
>
But . . . I can't access my non-home shares now, like
[cdrom]
comment = Samba server's CD-ROM
writable = no
locking = no
path = /media/cdrom
users
Quoting Daniel Fernández ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Well, at least we have the filesystem privileges to protect the
> sensitive data. But I dont like this bug, anyway.
So don't we.
I think it's probably time to apply one of the patches used in Ubuntu:
--- smb.conf~ 2007-01-31 06:01:20.973216065 +
Quoting Daniel Fernández ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Package: samba
> Version: 3.0.23d-4
> Severity: normal
>
> Samba server list system files under backup share even whent backup
> share does not exist. However, the contents of the files cannot be
> readed. This bug has been found on etch and sarge sy
Well, at least we have the filesystem privileges to protect the
sensitive data. But I dont like this bug, anyway.
Thanks for the answers,
Daniel.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, Feb 10, 2007 at 11:45:53AM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
> tags 4410308 confirmed
> thanks
> Quoting Daniel Fernández ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > Package: samba
> > Version: 3.0.23d-4
> > Severity: normal
> > Samba server list system files under backup share even whent backup
> > share doe
tags 4410308 confirmed
thanks
Quoting Daniel Fernández ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Package: samba
> Version: 3.0.23d-4
> Severity: normal
>
> Samba server list system files under backup share even whent backup
> share does not exist. However, the contents of the files cannot be
> readed. This bug has
Package: samba
Version: 3.0.23d-4
Severity: normal
Samba server list system files under backup share even whent backup
share does not exist. However, the contents of the files cannot be
readed. This bug has been found on etch and sarge systems, in amd64 and
i386 architectures.
For reproduce the b
14 matches
Mail list logo
