On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 07:32:45AM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
> > > Interesting spot. FWIW, we do provide a fedault [homes] share so that
> > > will probably happen with the defautl setup of the package.
> >
> > What about adding "backup" to "invalid users" in smb.conf fix this
> > problem?
>
> > Interesting spot. FWIW, we do provide a fedault [homes] share so that
> > will probably happen with the defautl setup of the package.
>
> What about adding "backup" to "invalid users" in smb.conf fix this
> problem?
For "backup", yes, but I think this doesn't scale well. The problem
could ha
On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 10:30:16AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 10, 2007 at 04:47:46PM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
> > Quoting Daniel Fernández ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > > Package: samba
> > > Version: 3.0.23d-4
> > > Severity: normal
> > > Samba server list system files under
> What about adding "backup" to "invalid users" in smb.conf fix this
> problem?
It will require to add all system users (I mean all the ones that are
in /etc/passwd and are not "real" users). The valid users = %S option
works well for me.
Daniel.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, Feb 10, 2007 at 04:47:46PM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Quoting Daniel Fernández ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > Package: samba
> > Version: 3.0.23d-4
> > Severity: normal
> >
> > Samba server list system files under backup share even whent backup
> > share does not exist. However, the conte
> > > + valid users = %S
> >
> > > With this, at least the default setup will not expose such valid
> > > system users home directories to others.
> > >
> > But . . . I can't access my non-home shares now, like
>
>
> Sounds like you added "valid users = %S" to the global section while
> you
Quoting Daniel Fernández ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > + valid users = %S
>
> > With this, at least the default setup will not expose such valid
> > system users home directories to others.
> >
> But . . . I can't access my non-home shares now, like
Sounds like you added "valid users = %S" to the
> + valid users = %S
> With this, at least the default setup will not expose such valid
> system users home directories to others.
>
But . . . I can't access my non-home shares now, like
[cdrom]
comment = Samba server's CD-ROM
writable = no
locking = no
path = /media/cdrom
users
Quoting Daniel Fernández ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Well, at least we have the filesystem privileges to protect the
> sensitive data. But I dont like this bug, anyway.
So don't we.
I think it's probably time to apply one of the patches used in Ubuntu:
--- smb.conf~ 2007-01-31 06:01:20.973216065 +
9 matches
Mail list logo
