On Fri, 3 Aug 2007 12:31:41 +0200
maximilian attems [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
can you please test the latest and greatest linux image in
testing 2.6.21 otherwise backports has it too.
if bug still reproducible 2.6.22 from unstable would be the
next candidate.
Maks,
I just gave it a try with
tags 410415 moreinfo
stop
can you please test the latest and greatest linux image in
testing 2.6.21 otherwise backports has it too.
if bug still reproducible 2.6.22 from unstable would be the
next candidate.
if bug still reproducible upstream needs to get informed.
regards
--
maks
--
To
Package: ntpdate
Version: 1:4.2.2.p4+dfsg-1
Severity: normal
This is the behavior I am experiencing:
10 Feb 04:46:56 ntpdate[9287]: step time server 195.234.188.3 offset
-6975.269708 sec
10 Feb 06:08:48 ntpdate[13281]: step time server 80.127.4.179 offset
-2070.299497 sec
10 Feb 06:33:20
On Sat, Feb 10, 2007 at 11:29:41PM +0800, clayton wrote:
Package: ntpdate
Version: 1:4.2.2.p4+dfsg-1
Severity: normal
This is the behavior I am experiencing:
10 Feb 04:46:56 ntpdate[9287]: step time server 195.234.188.3 offset
-6975.269708 sec
10 Feb 06:08:48 ntpdate[13281]: step
reassign 410415 linux-2.6
found 410415 2.6.18-7
thanks
On Sun, Feb 11, 2007 at 01:07:04AM +0800, Clayton wrote:
On Sat, 10 Feb 2007 17:28:07 +0100
Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This looks like either a hardware or kernel problem to me.
Kurt, thanks for the prompt reply. This is a
On Sat, 10 Feb 2007 17:28:07 +0100
Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Feb 10, 2007 at 11:29:41PM +0800, clayton wrote:
Package: ntpdate
Version: 1:4.2.2.p4+dfsg-1
10 Feb 04:46:56 ntpdate[9287]: step time server 195.234.188.3
offset -6975.269708 sec 10 Feb 06:08:48
6 matches
Mail list logo
