Dirk Eddelbuettel a écrit :
> On 22 March 2007 at 12:27, Luigi Ballabio wrote:
> | On Thu, 2007-03-22 at 05:17 -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> | > What is the reason you can't just use Aurelien's patch?
> |
> | Silly of me---it was already applied in the latest sources (if was fixed
> | in 0.3.1
On 22 March 2007 at 12:27, Luigi Ballabio wrote:
| On Thu, 2007-03-22 at 05:17 -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| > What is the reason you can't just use Aurelien's patch?
|
| Silly of me---it was already applied in the latest sources (if was fixed
| in 0.3.14, as far as I can see from the logs) s
On Thu, 2007-03-22 at 05:17 -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> What is the reason you can't just use Aurelien's patch?
Silly of me---it was already applied in the latest sources (if was fixed
in 0.3.14, as far as I can see from the logs) so I applied it in reverse
and made the installation not work
On 22 March 2007 at 09:03, Luigi Ballabio wrote:
| On Wed, 2007-03-21 at 21:58 -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| > On 21 March 2007 at 13:20, Luigi Ballabio wrote:
| > | Dirk,
| > | can you check out the latest sources from CVS and check whether it
| > | works correctly now?
| >
| > Didn't work
On Wed, 2007-03-21 at 21:58 -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> On 21 March 2007 at 13:20, Luigi Ballabio wrote:
> | Dirk,
> | can you check out the latest sources from CVS and check whether it
> | works correctly now?
>
> Didn't work:
>
> lrwxrwxrwx root/root 0 2007-03-21 21:52 ./usr/l
On 21 March 2007 at 13:20, Luigi Ballabio wrote:
| On Wed, 2007-03-07 at 08:25 -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| > Luigi: The isse that Aurelien discovered is that starting with 0.3.14, the
| > static library had a wrong softlink "down to my build directory". [ Debian,
| > and I believe the other
On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 01:20:37PM +0100, Luigi Ballabio wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-03-07 at 08:25 -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> > Luigi: The isse that Aurelien discovered is that starting with 0.3.14, the
> > static library had a wrong softlink "down to my build directory". [ Debian,
> > and I beli
On Wed, 2007-03-07 at 08:25 -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> Luigi: The isse that Aurelien discovered is that starting with 0.3.14, the
> static library had a wrong softlink "down to my build directory". [ Debian,
> and I believe the other distros, create a a tree of directories below the
> curren
Aurelien,
Thanks so much for finding the bug, and even more so for the patch. I'm
cc'ing upstream here.
Luigi: The isse that Aurelien discovered is that starting with 0.3.14, the
static library had a wrong softlink "down to my build directory". [ Debian,
and I believe the other distros, create a
tag 413679 + patch
thanks
On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 11:13:25AM -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> |
> | I will have a closer look to the debian/rules file at home this evening.
>
> I really appreciate that. Quantlib takes some time to build, but I guess the
> issue here is between 'debian/rules bu
Dirk Eddelbuettel a écrit :
> Salut Aurelien.
>
> On 6 March 2007 at 16:11, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> | Package: libquantlib0-dev
> | Version: 0.3.14-2
> | Severity: grave
> | )
> | The static library of libquantlib0-dev is unusable,
>
> Aboslutely. At 29 mb it is pretty hard to work with :)
>
>
Salut Aurelien.
On 6 March 2007 at 16:11, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
| Package: libquantlib0-dev
| Version: 0.3.14-2
| Severity: grave
| )
| The static library of libquantlib0-dev is unusable,
Aboslutely. At 29 mb it is pretty hard to work with :)
| as the symlink /usr/lib/libQuantLib.a is broken.
Package: libquantlib0-dev
Version: 0.3.14-2
Severity: grave
The static library of libquantlib0-dev is unusable, as the symlink
/usr/lib/libQuantLib.a is broken. It points to:
/build/buildd/quantlib-0.3.13/debian/libquantlib-0.3.13/usr/lib/libQuantLib-0.3.13.a
-- System Information:
Debian Relea
13 matches
Mail list logo
