Bug#414473: tetex-bin: Should depend on gs-gpl, because epstopdf fails without it

2007-03-12 Thread Frank Küster
Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > No, it already Suggests it, and that is enough: epstopdf is only a very > minor part of teTeX and does not warrant a Depends. I didn't notice that you reported the bug against the sarge version. For sarge, the answer should have been: "No, because it Sug

Bug#414473: tetex-bin: Should depend on gs-gpl, because epstopdf fails without it

2007-03-12 Thread Frank Küster
reassign 414473 texlive-base-bin retitle 414473 texlive-base-bin: Should Suggest/Recommend gs thanks Holger Jeromin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The package should depend on gs or gs-gpl because at least epstopdf > needs this software. No, it already Suggests it, and that is enough: epstopdf is

Bug#414473: tetex-bin: Should depend on gs-gpl, because epstopdf fails without it

2007-03-11 Thread Holger Jeromin
Package: tetex-bin Version: 2.0.2-30sarge4 Severity: minor The package should depend on gs or gs-gpl because at least epstopdf needs this software. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.34 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versi