Hi José Carlos,
FWIW I'm not content with the implemented solution as far as inclusion in
etch is concerned. Previous versions of the package clearly did not need
libpth20, the new version does and the effect on the package's behavior as a
result of this new library dep seem to be unknown.
The
On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 03:13:28AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
Hi José Carlos,
FWIW I'm not content with the implemented solution as far as inclusion in
etch is concerned. Previous versions of the package clearly did not need
libpth20, the new version does and the effect on the package's
On Sun, Mar 18, 2007 at 01:23:43AM +0100, Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo wrote:
Hi,
I don't know why this didn't happen in my i386 pbuilder also. Perhaps
there is some other package dependeing on libpth-dev in i386 but not in
other arches
This seems to be a difference in the configure
On Sun, Mar 18, 2007 at 12:10:25PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
On Sun, Mar 18, 2007 at 01:23:43AM +0100, Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo wrote:
Hi,
I don't know why this didn't happen in my i386 pbuilder also. Perhaps
there is some other package dependeing on libpth-dev in i386 but not in
Package: gpgme1.0
Version: 1.1.2-3
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your package is failing to build with the following error:
checking for GNU Pth... *FAILED*
++
| Unable to locate GNU Pth in any system-wide location (see $PATH).
|
Hi,
I don't know why this didn't happen in my i386 pbuilder also. Perhaps
there is some other package dependeing on libpth-dev in i386 but not in
other arches
El sáb, 17-03-2007 a las 12:24 +0100, Kurt Roeckx escribió:
Package: gpgme1.0
Version: 1.1.2-3
Severity: serious
Hi,
6 matches
Mail list logo
