Hello Romain,
On Sat, Mar 24, 2007 at 01:56:06PM +0100, Romain Beauxis wrote:
> Le samedi 24 mars 2007 08:26, Christian Perrier a écrit :
> > Well, not IMHO. This is a perfect use case for NEWS.Debian, indeed...
>
> Is this sent my mail in case the install is done without any frontend ?
Well, if
Quoting Romain Beauxis ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Le samedi 24 mars 2007 08:26, Christian Perrier a écrit :
> > > > At first glance, I see this one as a case for debconf abuse.
> > >
> > > Well, changing the location of a configuration file is worth the case for
> > > a debconf note I think.
> >
> > We
Le samedi 24 mars 2007 08:26, Christian Perrier a écrit :
> > > At first glance, I see this one as a case for debconf abuse.
> >
> > Well, changing the location of a configuration file is worth the case for
> > a debconf note I think.
>
> Well, not IMHO. This is a perfect use case for NEWS.Debian,
Quoting Romain Beauxis ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > At first glance, I see this one as a case for debconf abuse.
>
> Well, changing the location of a configuration file is worth the case for a
> debconf note I think.
Well, not IMHO. This is a perfect use case for NEWS.Debian, indeed...
signatur
Le vendredi 23 mars 2007 18:19, Christian Perrier a écrit :
> Quoting Helge Kreutzmann ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > Package: mediawiki1.7
> > Version: 1.7.1-12
> > Severity: normal
> >
> > In a recent version of mediawiki1.7 you added a debconf note which
> > does not make any sense. You state:
>
> Deb
Quoting Helge Kreutzmann ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Package: mediawiki1.7
> Version: 1.7.1-12
> Severity: normal
>
> In a recent version of mediawiki1.7 you added a debconf note which
> does not make any sense. You state:
Debconf notes are most of the time evil, anyway.
At first glance, I see this o
Le vendredi 23 mars 2007 16:53, Helge Kreutzmann a écrit :
> > Yes, this is a typo..
> > I fear any debconf update would be pointless with current typo..
>
> Why? As I see from your next message, only one string (a directory
> name) changed, which you probably could even unfuzzy yourself, but
> tha
Hello,
On Fri, Mar 23, 2007 at 12:06:10AM +0100, Romain Beauxis wrote:
> Le jeudi 22 mars 2007 21:17, Helge Kreutzmann a écrit :
> > If the configuration file previously had been in /etc/mediawiki1.7 and
> > still resides there, what is the reason something is "solved" and how
> > can this fail?
>
Le jeudi 22 mars 2007 21:17, Helge Kreutzmann a écrit :
> If the configuration file previously had been in /etc/mediawiki1.7 and
> still resides there, what is the reason something is "solved" and how
> can this fail?
Yes, this is a typo..
I fear any debconf update would be pointless with current
Package: mediawiki1.7
Version: 1.7.1-12
Severity: normal
In a recent version of mediawiki1.7 you added a debconf note which
does not make any sense. You state:
Configuration files fixed
There was a bug in previous packages that forced configuration files
to be located in /etc/mediawiki1.7.
This
10 matches
Mail list logo
