Bug#418267: bind: Should not be included in Lenny

2007-04-11 Thread LaMont Jones
On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 06:08:13PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: As it has already been deprecated in README.Debian and the upgrade path from bind to bind9 can hardly be done in an automated manner, it should be sufficient to simply have bind8 removed? Or should we add a note into the

Bug#418267: bind: Should not be included in Lenny

2007-04-11 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
reassign 418267 ftp.debian.org thanks LaMont Jones wrote: On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 06:08:13PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: As it has already been deprecated in README.Debian and the upgrade path from bind to bind9 can hardly be done in an automated manner, it should be sufficient to

Bug#418267: bind: Should not be included in Lenny

2007-04-10 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
LaMont Jones wrote: On Sun, Apr 08, 2007 at 06:54:43PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: Bind 8 is obsolete and should not be included in Lenny, which would require to support it at least until 2011. Absolute agreement here. As it has already been deprecated in README.Debian and the

Bug#418267: bind: Should not be included in Lenny

2007-04-08 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
Package: bind Severity: serious Bind 8 is obsolete and should not be included in Lenny, which would require to support it at least until 2011. Cheers, Moritz -- System Information: Debian Release: 4.0 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686)

Bug#418267: bind: Should not be included in Lenny

2007-04-08 Thread LaMont Jones
On Sun, Apr 08, 2007 at 06:54:43PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: Bind 8 is obsolete and should not be included in Lenny, which would require to support it at least until 2011. Absolute agreement here. lamont -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe.