* John W. Eaton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-04-10 15:18]:
> I think this is unfortunate since Octave is useful on its own without
> Octave Forge and I think 2.9.10 is much better than 2.9.9.
A not-so-unrelated question: currently, the virtual package called "octave"
in Debian depends on octave2.1.
* John W. Eaton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-04-10 15:18]:
> On 10-Apr-2007, Thomas Weber wrote:
>
> | Package: octave2.9
> | Version: 2.9.10-4
> | Severity: grave
> | Justification: renders package unusable
> |
> | Octave 2.9.10 doesn't play well with the current octave2.9-forge packages in
> | De
On 10-Apr-2007, Thomas Weber wrote:
| Package: octave2.9
| Version: 2.9.10-4
| Severity: grave
| Justification: renders package unusable
|
| Octave 2.9.10 doesn't play well with the current octave2.9-forge packages in
| Debian, so it shouldn't enter testing in the current state.
I think this is
3 matches
Mail list logo
