[EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
>> The point is that your system has very akward things, as what lies in
>> your /lib/tls:
>> * _seems_ to come from a libc 2.3.2;
>> * still has a libc-2.3.6.so too that has not the correct permissions
>> _BUT_ the same size and date as the libc-2.3.2.so (whic
> The point is that your system has very akward things, as what lies in
> your /lib/tls:
> * _seems_ to come from a libc 2.3.2;
> * still has a libc-2.3.6.so too that has not the correct permissions
> _BUT_ the same size and date as the libc-2.3.2.so (which is
> completely absurd).
>
On Sat, Apr 14, 2007 at 10:21:52PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Am Samstag, 14. April 2007 18:46 schrieben Sie:
> > > Here are the listing of /lib/tls:
> > >
> > > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 88904 2005-05-10 22:01 ld-2.3.2.so
> > > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 11 2006-07-14 00:59 ld-linux.so.2 ->
Am Samstag, 14. April 2007 18:46 schrieben Sie:
> > Here are the listing of /lib/tls:
> >
> > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 88904 2005-05-10 22:01 ld-2.3.2.so
> > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 11 2006-07-14 00:59 ld-linux.so.2 ->
> > ld-2.3.2.so -rw-r--r-- 1 root root9324 2005-05-10 22:01
> > libanl-2
> Here are the listing of /lib/tls:
>
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 88904 2005-05-10 22:01 ld-2.3.2.so
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 11 2006-07-14 00:59 ld-linux.so.2 -> ld-2.3.2.so
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root9324 2005-05-10 22:01 libanl-2.3.2.so
Which version of libc6 was installed before you att
> > There are a lot of files in /lib/tls that belong to libc 2.3.2
> > (libdl-2.3.2.so ...). Perhaps they were not deleted by an old upgrade.
>
> Could you please give us the date of those files (ls -l /lib/tls would
> be the best), so that we can try to trace the problem to a libc6 version?
Here
[EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
> Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
>>> Package: libc6
>>> Version: 2.5-1
>>> Severity: critical
>>>
>>> If I upgrade to libc6 2.5-1, I'll get this error:
>>>
>>> Preparing to replace libc6 2.5-1 (using
>>> .../archives/libc6_2.5-1_i386.deb) ... Unpack
Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
> > Package: libc6
> > Version: 2.5-1
> > Severity: critical
> >
> > If I upgrade to libc6 2.5-1, I'll get this error:
> >
> > Preparing to replace libc6 2.5-1 (using
> > .../archives/libc6_2.5-1_i386.deb) ... Unpacking replacement libc6 ...
> > S
[EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
> Package: libc6
> Version: 2.5-1
> Severity: critical
>
> If I upgrade to libc6 2.5-1, I'll get this error:
>
> Preparing to replace libc6 2.5-1 (using .../archives/libc6_2.5-1_i386.deb) ...
> Unpacking replacement libc6 ...
> Setting up libc6 (2.5-1) ...
> dpkg: relo
On Sat, Apr 14, 2007 at 05:42:57AM -0400, Clint Adams wrote:
> > If I upgrade to libc6 2.5-1, I'll get this error:
> >
> > I use kernel 2.6.20.4.
>
> Which architecture?
obviously i386:
>> Preparing to replace libc6 2.5-1 (using .../archives/libc6_2.5-1_i386.deb)
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··O
Pierre Habouzit a écrit :
> On Sat, Apr 14, 2007 at 11:26:29AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Package: libc6
>> Version: 2.5-1
>> Severity: critical
>>
>> If I upgrade to libc6 2.5-1, I'll get this error:
>>
>> Preparing to replace libc6 2.5-1 (using .../archives/libc6_2.5-1_i386.deb)
>> ...
>
On Sat, Apr 14, 2007 at 11:26:29AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Package: libc6
> Version: 2.5-1
> Severity: critical
>
> If I upgrade to libc6 2.5-1, I'll get this error:
>
> Preparing to replace libc6 2.5-1 (using .../archives/libc6_2.5-1_i386.deb) ...
> Unpacking replacement libc6 ...
> Se
> If I upgrade to libc6 2.5-1, I'll get this error:
>
> I use kernel 2.6.20.4.
Which architecture?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: libc6
Version: 2.5-1
Severity: critical
If I upgrade to libc6 2.5-1, I'll get this error:
Preparing to replace libc6 2.5-1 (using .../archives/libc6_2.5-1_i386.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement libc6 ...
Setting up libc6 (2.5-1) ...
dpkg: relocation error: /lib/tls/libc.so.6: symbol _dl_out
14 matches
Mail list logo
