* Thibaut VARENE [EMAIL PROTECTED] [070818 16:57]:
On 4/18/07, Tim Kientzle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not familiar with USE_FILE_OFFSET64, I thought the correct
incantation was this:
gcc -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64
Have you tried this?
This actually fixes it indeed. And guess what,
Bernhard R. Link wrote:
There might be ways to help libraries to still link against libarchive
without having to change their off_t to 64 bit, but using off64_t in
those cases.
Actually, I believe I've laid the groundwork to
make the 64-bit/32-bit issue completely transparent
to software
On 4/18/07, Tim Kientzle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thibaut VARENE wrote:
I'm the author and maintainer of libapache-mod-musicindex. Recently a
bug has been reported to me, by which the tarball download implemented
in mod-musicindex wouldn't work properly with apache2, while it did work
with
Note the use of __xstat64/fopen64 for the working code instead of
__xstat/fopen for the non-working code. At this point I believed it had
something to do with the use of 64bit offsets (USE_FILE_OFFSET64) but
simply adding this define to the compiler commandline didn't fix the
issue.
I'm not
On 4/18/07, Tim Kientzle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Note the use of __xstat64/fopen64 for the working code instead of
__xstat/fopen for the non-working code. At this point I believed it had
something to do with the use of 64bit offsets (USE_FILE_OFFSET64) but
simply adding this define to the
Package: libarchive-dev
Version: 1.2.53-2
Severity: important
Hi,
I'm the author and maintainer of libapache-mod-musicindex. Recently a
bug has been reported to me, by which the tarball download implemented
in mod-musicindex wouldn't work properly with apache2, while it did work
with
Thibaut VARENE wrote:
I'm the author and maintainer of libapache-mod-musicindex. Recently a
bug has been reported to me, by which the tarball download implemented
in mod-musicindex wouldn't work properly with apache2, while it did work
with apache1.3
Note the use of __xstat64/fopen64 for
Thibaut VARENE wrote:
bip 8192
Do I win?
bip 8192
Do I win?
bip 8192
(note, with libarchive 2, 'bip' (the output of archive_write) is 0,
which seems a bit more coherent).
Yes, libarchive 1 does return wrong values from archive_write.
As you observed, this bug is fixed in libarchive 2.
Tim
8 matches
Mail list logo
