Bug#420497: bug #420497: fixed in svn, patch attached

2007-05-05 Thread Osamu Aoki
On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 11:34:02PM +0200, Loïc Minier wrote: On Fri, Apr 27, 2007, Ming Hua wrote: I've fixed the hardcoding GTK IM module path bug in scim, based on the patch you sent. I used @GTK_BINARY_VERSION@ instead of $(GTK_BINARY_VERSION) as your patch did. From my understanding,

Bug#420497: bug #420497: fixed in svn, patch attached

2007-04-27 Thread Ming Hua
Hi Loïc, Thanks for cloning this bug to keep different issued tracked separately. I've fixed the hardcoding GTK IM module path bug in scim, based on the patch you sent. I used @GTK_BINARY_VERSION@ instead of $(GTK_BINARY_VERSION) as your patch did. From my understanding, these two should be

Bug#420497: bug #420497: fixed in svn, patch attached

2007-04-27 Thread Ming Hua
On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 04:28:11PM -0500, minghua wrote: I've attached the patch (SVN change r842) Oops. Really attached this time. Ming 2007.04.27 Index: debian/patches/10_gtk-immodule-install-dir.dpatch === ---

Bug#420497: bug #420497: fixed in svn, patch attached

2007-04-27 Thread Loïc Minier
On Fri, Apr 27, 2007, Ming Hua wrote: I've fixed the hardcoding GTK IM module path bug in scim, based on the patch you sent. I used @GTK_BINARY_VERSION@ instead of $(GTK_BINARY_VERSION) as your patch did. From my understanding, these two should be functionally identical for automake, I am