Bug#420701: GFDL is now in common-licenses

2007-11-29 Thread Russ Allbery
Simon Josefsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: How about fixing the stylistic issue of saying 'For example, ..., and so on.'? Actually, the filenames doesn't strike me as examples at all. How about 'In particular, /usr/..., respectively.' instead? And make sure the paths are given in the same

Bug#420701: GFDL is now in common-licenses

2007-07-06 Thread Simon Josefsson
Russ Allbery [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Giacomo A Catenazzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I think we should add also the license version in the first paragraph, as is stated in the second part, not to confuse users. + license, the GNU GPL (v. 2), the GNU LGPL (v. 2 and v. 2.1), and the GNU

Bug#420701: GFDL is now in common-licenses

2007-07-04 Thread Russ Allbery
Here is a proposed wording patch. Unless there are any objections, I'll commit this to my repository. --- orig/policy.sgml +++ mod/policy.sgml @@ -8653,8 +8653,8 @@ p Packages distributed under the UCB BSD license, the Artistic - license, the GNU GPL, and the GNU

Bug#420701: GFDL is now in common-licenses

2007-07-04 Thread Giacomo A. Catenazzi
Russ Allbery wrote: Here is a proposed wording patch. Unless there are any objections, I'll commit this to my repository. --- orig/policy.sgml +++ mod/policy.sgml @@ -8653,8 +8653,8 @@ p Packages distributed under the UCB BSD license, the Artistic - license, the GNU GPL,

Bug#420701: GFDL is now in common-licenses

2007-07-04 Thread Russ Allbery
Giacomo A Catenazzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I think we should add also the license version in the first paragraph, as is stated in the second part, not to confuse users. + license, the GNU GPL (v. 2), the GNU LGPL (v. 2 and v. 2.1), and the GNU FDL should refer + to the