forwarded #422419 http://www.exim.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=511
thanks
On Sun, May 06, 2007 at 09:57:16AM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
You'd be happy with something like this?
I have forwarded this suggestions upstream.
Greetings
Marc
--
On 2007-05-05 Oskar Liljeblad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: exim4
Version: 4.63-17
Severity: minor
It should be clarified in the documentation that tls_verify_hosts only
applies to TLS sessions. That is, if a sending host matched in
tls_verify_hosts does not attempt to use TLS, it can
On Sunday, May 06, 2007 at 09:16, Andreas Metzler wrote:
You'd be happy with something like this?
[..]
++Listing a host in tls_verify_hosts does not directly require the host
++to actually use TLS. It can still send SMTP commands through
++unencrypted connections. Enforcing TLS for a host
Package: exim4
Version: 4.63-17
Severity: minor
It should be clarified in the documentation that tls_verify_hosts only
applies to TLS sessions. That is, if a sending host matched in
tls_verify_hosts does not attempt to use TLS, it can still send messages
unencrypted.
This makes tls_verify_hosts
4 matches
Mail list logo