On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 09:31:03AM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
Jonny [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Robert Millan [EMAIL PROTECTED] write:
Can you try 800x600x32 and 640x480x8 ?
Since my machine is't supporting a 32-bit color, 800x600x32 can't be used.
If
it's 800x600x24, it works
Robert Millan [EMAIL PROTECTED] write:
Can you try 800x600x32 and 640x480x8 ?
Since my machine is't supporting a 32-bit color, 800x600x32 can't be used. If
it's 800x600x24, it works well.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
Jonny [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Robert Millan [EMAIL PROTECTED] write:
Can you try 800x600x32 and 640x480x8 ?
Since my machine is't supporting a 32-bit color, 800x600x32 can't be used. If
it's 800x600x24, it works well.
Ah nice. Robert, I think we might reduce the color depth used by
Jonny [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Does your video hardware support vesa?
Yes, it works correctly if c is typed and input.
grub font /boot/grub/unifont.pff
grub insmod gfxterm
grub set gfxmode=800x600x8
grub terminal gfxterm
Does:
grub font /boot/grub/unifont.pff
grub set
On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 05:14:02AM +0900, Jonny wrote:
Does your video hardware support vesa?
Yes, it works correctly if c is typed and input.
grub font /boot/grub/unifont.pff
grub insmod gfxterm
grub set gfxmode=800x600x8
grub terminal gfxterm
[...]
font /boot/grub/unifont.pff
clone 422794
retitle -1 gfxterm breaks boot
tags -1 moreinfo
thanks
Ok, this bug is for discussing customisation now. For the boot problem,
please use the newly created one (Jonny, please answer my question about
boot failure there).
On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 05:22:43PM -0300, Otavio Salvador
Robert Millan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 05:22:43PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
Robert Millan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Please do not perform update-grub compulsorily by postinst. It is very
unpleasant to overwrite grub.cfg freely.
I suppose it doesn't harm
On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 09:32:09AM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
I propose that we add a variable to select terminal, so that user can
disable
this feature altogether if he wants. Jonny, does that work for you?
While I ack that we ought to offer this option I also think we need to
Robert Millan [EMAIL PROTECTED] write:
Can you explain that? What happens when font is processed?
A screen shot is attached. The operation is not accepted from this state at
all.
begin 644 grub.png
MB5!.1PT*@[EMAIL PROTECTED]0$`(```!8%1QY7!(67,```L2
Package: grub-pc
Version: 1.95+20070507-1
Severity: grave
grub.cfg which broke in update-grub is generated. /etc/grub.d/00_header:
if test -e /boot/grub/unifont.pff ; then
cat EOF
font /boot/grub/unifont.pff
set gfxmode=640x480x32
insmod gfxterm
insmod vbe
terminal gfxterm
EOF
fi
tags 422794 moreinfo
thanks
On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 05:13:23PM +0900, Jonny wrote:
font /boot/grub/unifont.pff does not run normally. The command which
continues after that worsens the very thing further.
Can you explain that? What happens when font is processed?
Does your video hardware
Robert Millan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Please do not perform update-grub compulsorily by postinst. It is very
unpleasant to overwrite grub.cfg freely.
I suppose it doesn't harm to add an option to disable it; perhaps we could
even reuse /etc/kernel-img.conf. Could you file a separate bug
12 matches
Mail list logo
