Bug#422882: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Bug#422882: openssl: mistake in note on x509v3_config manual page

2007-05-15 Thread Javier Barroso
Sorry, my first response was treated as a new thread, Kurt Roeckx wrote: On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 06:03:51PM +0200, Javier Barroso wrote: Package: openssl Version: 0.9.8e-4 Severity: normal Tags: patch I see no patch? I have the doubt, If somebody propose a small change I don't

Bug#422882: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Bug#422882: openssl: mistake in note on x509v3_config manual page

2007-05-15 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Tue, May 15, 2007 at 03:49:20PM +0200, Javier Barroso wrote: Sorry, my first response was treated as a new thread, I did get your mail, I just didn't have time to answer it. Kurt Roeckx wrote: On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 06:03:51PM +0200, Javier Barroso wrote: Package: openssl Version:

Bug#422882: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Bug#422882: openssl: mistake in note on x509v3_config manual page

2007-05-08 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 06:03:51PM +0200, Javier Barroso wrote: Package: openssl Version: 0.9.8e-4 Severity: normal Tags: patch I see no patch? at NOTE section on x509v3_config manual page says: If an extension is multi-value and a field value must contain a comma the long form must be

Bug#422882: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Bug#422882: openssl: mistake in note on x509v3_config manual page

2007-05-08 Thread Javier Barroso
Kurt wrote: I see no patch? I have the doubt, If somebody propose a small change I don't know if it could be consider like a patch. Now than I know about it is not a patch, I won't tag patch anymore if a patch file is not attached. And I have no idea what you think is wrong ... I can't