notfound 424629 samba_3.0.24-6etch2
found 424629 samba_3.0.25-1
thanks
Quoting Kai Henningsen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Package: samba
Version: 3.0.24-6etch1
Severity: important
(Versions below from after I downgraded Samba: 3.0.24-6 works fine.)
Symptoms: on a share with force group set,
Hello Christian,
Am Mon, 21 May 2007 18:19:55 +0200
schrieb Christian Perrier [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
--4652b713_4b2230d6_17ed
gpg: Signatur am Mo 21 Mai 2007 18:19:55 CEST mit DSA Schlüssel, ID
C0143D2D, erfolgt
gpg: Falsche Unterschrift von Christian Perrier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello Christian,
Am Thu, 17 May 2007 11:10:17 +0200
schrieb Christian Perrier [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
gpg: Signatur am Do 17 Mai 2007 11:10:17 CEST mit DSA Schlüssel, ID
C0143D2D, erfolgt
gpg: Falsche Unterschrift von Christian Perrier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hmm.
I'm afraid I don't really get all
gpg: Signatur am Do 17 Mai 2007 11:10:17 CEST mit DSA Schlüssel, ID
C0143D2D, erfolgt
gpg: Falsche Unterschrift von Christian Perrier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Well, you're probably missing the Debian keyring on your
machine. 0xC0143D2D is definitely in it.
Anyway...
I'm afraid I don't
Christian Perrier wrote:
The samba team just sent me the attached patch which supposedly fixes
#424629 for 3.0.24-6etch1 (in short, it fixes that RC bug in etch's
samba).
So, in short, we should update the version in etch with this patch.
I'm currently building an updated package and will
The samba team just sent me the attached patch which supposedly fixes
#424629 for 3.0.24-6etch1 (in short, it fixes that RC bug in etch's
samba).
OK, I succeeded building a test case.
On an etch samba server running 3.0.24-6etch1, as this to smb.conf:
[test]
comment = Test
I haven't looked very closely at what's going on, but I bet the problem
is related to the fix for CVE-2007-2444, which changes the way in which
samba gets root access when it needs it. It switches from
become_root_uid_only() to become_root(). The names of those functions
suggest that
Quoting Kai Henningsen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Package: samba
Version: 3.0.24-6etch1
Severity: important
(Versions below from after I downgraded Samba: 3.0.24-6 works fine.)
Symptoms: on a share with force group set, users no longer have access
according to their usual groups; as newly
On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 06:23:38PM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
Hmmm, OK, that's enough. There are now enough such issues raised to
prevent us to allow 3.0.25-1 to migrate to testing too quickly, until
all this is examined.
As a consequence, I raise the severity of this bug report to make
Package: samba
Version: 3.0.24-6etch1
Severity: important
(Versions below from after I downgraded Samba: 3.0.24-6 works fine.)
Symptoms: on a share with force group set, users no longer have access
according to their usual groups; as newly created files (correctly) have
the forced group,
severity 424629 serious
thanks
Quoting Kai Henningsen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Package: samba
Version: 3.0.24-6etch1
Severity: important
(Versions below from after I downgraded Samba: 3.0.24-6 works fine.)
Hmmm, OK, that's enough. There are now enough such issues raised to
prevent us to allow
11 matches
Mail list logo
